Beatles/Sweet Little Sixteen
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (63)
-
hell yeah, I'm sixteen:D
-
The sound of the piece is much better in Chuck. Here with The Beatles is very monotonous.
-
@danielgalarza nope!! i know chuck were good, but not as good as beatles
-
@scarletspidey5 damn agree with that!!!!
-
@AllieIam9 Well she was just seventeeeeeeeen........ you know what i meeeeeean :D
-
My last hour of being "sweet little sixteen." It's amazing how quickly time flies by, isn't it? I'm gunna be 17 in less than an hour now, so I thought I would spend it with my favorite band ever.
-
@scarletspidey5 But Chuck Berry is Better
-
You can clearly hear the attempt to create stereo effects from the original mono recording. It seems that it might be time to re evaluate the original tape and remaster it with the latest techniques, this time in the true original mono. This has not been worked on since the late 1970's to my knowledge. Cheers
-
this is the beatles.
-
Another classic performed by The Beatles ! These four guys were the best to ever hit the music scene ! Long live their music !



stones are not the greatest the beatles are the greatest!!!!
scarletspidey5 2 years ago 58
There is. This whole concert was recorded from a single microphone then buried for 15 years. The Beatles thought the sound quality was absolutely hopeless, but when you're dealing with something as hot as this, miracles can be made possible. Lingasong Records invested $100,000 to clean up the tape as much as possible and reduce the audience noise in the background through a 16-track transfer and remix. Later, the vocals were brought more forward. Still, it's the Beatles, live, with Ringo.
gpietsch 2 years ago 17