Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Question Time: Why doesn't UK act against Mugabe? Part 1/2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,329
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 7, 2008

QuestionTime: 5th June 2008. Why is the UK sitting back and allowing Robert Mugabe to torture and kill members of the opposition party?

The panel will include the Foreign Secretary David Miliband, senior Conservative politician Lord Hurd, the Liberal Democrat chief economic spokesman Vince Cable, the director of Liberty Shami Chakrabarti and the columnist Peter Hitchens.

Bare in mind this was recorded on the 5th June, a day before Mugabe banned aid workers from distributing aid in order to starve Zimbabweans into voting for the ZANU-PF in 3 weeks time, and banning all opposition rallies.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (boognish100)

  • Thank you for this upload boognish.

  • Your welcome :)

  • Milliband get your band and march on to hell. Who the F are you to tell a sovereign nation what future its citizens must follow ? I know it hurts you like crazy to see a small African nation which once was your erstwhile property (Rhodesia), created by the most evil man by the name of Cecil Rhodes who enslaved its people and raped its resources on behalf of your crown and had the audacity to name it after himself. Mugabe is a man who has been educated in your system and knows all your tricks.

  • The British government isn't telling Zimbabweans what future to follow. Mugabe on the other hand most certainly is, through intimidation and torture, censorship of the opposition and withholding aid.

  • What royalty exactly do you believe Mugabe is descended from? I can assure you he doesn't have royal ancestry. Even if he did, why would that be relevant under a democratic system? It wouldn't hypothetically make his rule any more legitimate.

Top Comments

  • Zimbabwe should be recolonised by the British.

  • Good points by Peter Hitchens.

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @shahideurope Not just that, he supplied Milosevic and Serbia with money for invasion on Kosovo. Scum

  • Why does Britain sit back and allow Mugabe to tortute and kill his own people? Because they put him there!

  • It all dates back to UDI. Had Smith not been so arrogant to do that, Mugabe in 79 wouldn't have come to power. The Govt here is hesitant to go over with military force now as it'd be Neo Colonialistic in many eyes. There are also no real economic benefits for the UK to go over there, Mugabe ruined the country. The Middle East is something they interfere in as a) they want pro Western puppet Govts installed and b) Oil reserves amongst other resources of economic benefit.

  • Great Britain gets slagged so much for her colonial past, yet this is one of many examples of what happens when certain Country's are allowed to rule themselves. 

  • Hurd supported genocide in Bosnia - fucker I hope he burns in hell.

  • the same goes for Ethiopian dictator Meles Zenawi, but no one in the West cares to criticize him, do they.

  • @DeborahWinter "Mugabe great"? LOL He's murdering his own people. How is that 'great'?

  • Boognish? As in Ween? I do hope so.

  • Or do you prefer to invent your history instead, rather than examining primary sources?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more