Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Have the Evolutionary Scientists Found Adam and Eve?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,676
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2007

Gary Parker.
MORE - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE4lEeuyryc .

Mitochondrial Eve - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1TKiQoNCB0

"It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end, no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin's pronouncements and predictions..Let's cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is chocking us and holding us back." L.L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search




Northwest Creation Network
23208 55th Ave W.
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
206-465-1635
contact@nwcreation.net

  • likes, 32 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (BereanBeacon)

  • "Talk about hanging around on a Saturday night waiting for the phone to ring. 70,000 years difference!"

    Mitochondrial "Eve" and Y-Chromosomal "Adam" did not mate with one another. That is what is being implied here, and that is NOT how it works. No scientist makes that claim. Once again, another creationist being intentionally deceitful, and willfully excluding important information so as to exploit an ignorant audience.

  • EvoLIEtion, "Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation." Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (1981). p. 19.

  • Wow. What a profound quote.

    Of course, scientists also have no proof that there DOES NOT exist a diamond the size of a VW Bug buried deep in the heart of Mt. Everest. I suppose it is reasonable to belief the diamond exists. Yes? Not only that, but it's reasonable to grab a shovel and dig for the diamond every Sunday morning. Right?

  • At least we could, in principle, dig for the diamond. How are we to dig for your creator? Tell me.

    Your post, which is merely quote mining, is an argument from ignorance, an appeal to authority, and a reliance upon the idea that one COULD prove a negative. One CANNOT prove a negative. Not when dealing with the supernatural.

  • EvoLIEtion, neither of us can prove what we say and only have the present to oberve. The Bible says that the Creator is established by his creation and therefore we are without excuse. The proof of the Bible lies in the reading of it yourself. Gospel of John at h t t p://w w w dot youtube dot com/watch?v=kY-N-2Y1K2U so please listen to find out who Jesus was what he was about. What have you got to lose?

  • EvoLIEtion, I supposed if did around graves and rocks long enough you will end up will many holes and which in more conjectures why there wasn't any thing of vaue.

Top Comments

  • I believe no such thing, nor do ANY scientists make such claims. Here we see again another creationist who comes stumbling out of the gates, and the first thing that comes out of his mouth (his fingers) is a strawman. Strawmaning the theory of evolution will not prove to be a very sturdy foundation from which to build your arguments, I assure you.

    Also, if, by chance, you are a Christian, I would refer you Matthew 5:22.

  • "I supposed if did around graves and rocks long enough you will end up will many holes and which in more conjectures why there wasn't any thing of vaue."

    Please elaborate upon this analogy. I'm not quite getting it.

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guy is totally ignorant. He know's nothing about radiometric dating or genetic dating methods. He also know's little about Biblical "dating" methods. The Bible doesn't say how old the earth is. Bishop Ussher worked this out from non biblical sources plus biblical sources and other dogma of his time. Anyone that says the Bible says the earth is 6000 years old is simple a parrot.

  • Gary Parker is such an idiot! Mitochondrial Eve isn't our only female common ancestor. She is only the closest common ancestor who has a direct female-only lineage to the current generation (since mitochondrial DNA is only passed through the mother) Creationist LYING FAIL. Lying for Jesus, I hope that feels good inside.

  • The funny part about this is that the original mutation estimate that led to our modern 'human form' was more than 30x the biblical estimate. Furthermore, the predecessor to the "Adam" and "Eve" about which they're speak was a common ancestor shared with today's hominine primates. I don't see what the biblical celebration is all about in light of these rather damning facts. Finally, the cradle of mankind is in Africa, not the biblical Iraqi Garden of Eden.

  • This is a million piece jigsaw puzzle and in the ToE all of these thing line up seamlessly. All independently discovered and separate. What does creation science (ID) have to offer us ? What predictions can it make. How does it solve real science problems in the world ? What are its benefits ?? NONE. It's complete pseudoscience built on nothing more than denial after denial. Yep, that's not ignorance.

    Here's your chance to show us how ignorant *we* all are and a problem for the U.S.

  • SHOW US the fossil model that plainly shows how all the "KINDS" micro-evolved into the species they are today. SHOW US on paper how these are all seperate branches that cannot be connected. SHOW US the model of genetics that backs up the definition of, and demonstrates, "KINDS". SHOW US the microbiological model that shows the KINDS concept is valid. SHOW US the physiological model that backs up the previous.

  • Let's see these guys put their money where their mouth is. They've had DECADES to come up with a model that presents "KINDS". I wonder why they haven't bothered to try and do that ? Could it be that it can't be done and it's easier to just simply say "there is no proof"?

    Instead, bring on the science studies of Creation Science otherwise all you have is denial and ignorance. Genuine self generated research, instead of mangling someone else's work. That's NOT science. SHOW US THE MONEY.

  • You think studying true science breeds ignorance? We are an ignorant nation because the fundies resist and try to undermine science. It's proven daily every time some home/christian schooled kid shows up spouting hovind (and other MDs/Dentists) with a store bought PhD, showing the same lack of understanding science that they do. It's weakened when the school books are influenced to make them PC and soften the information so no feathers get ruffled. The problem is in the public schools too.

  • I think some people think that Darwins original theory is like the bible. He said it one day and it's stapled to the wall in every scientists office held to like scripture. It's slowly modified and has new fields of inquiry over two centuries and he wouldn't recognize it today. He would stand in awe at the things we have discovered say, through genetics. But I guess it's just easier to see things that way as well have someone to demonize. Let's pull him out of his grave and beat his bones ehh ?

  • "Its not the idea of creation which is keeping us in ignorance. Its the idea that evolution is proven and can't be challenged thats generating ignorance"

    No, it's the fundamentalists who have their world view challenged by what science has discovered. This is why the need exists to dishonestly misrepresent science while conflating evolution-abiogenesis-astronom­y-cosmology-genetics-microbiol­ogy and others into one heading called "evolution". This gives you a single target to attack.

  • joroma77

    Not if you undestand evolution.. If you do not undestand it, ya you could use your imagination. Or you could try to learn about Evolution.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more