Uploaded on Nov 15, 2011
~Unslave Humanity Tactical Media: http://whynotnews.eu/?p=2045 ~subscribe my new channel: http://youtube.com/TransDeHumanism
Transhumanism was founded in the 1950s by top eugenicist Julian Huxley and the Rockefeller Foundation, as a new brand name for the pseudoscience of Eugenics. Its obsession for culling off the 'genetically inferior', while at the same time striving to promote dominance for the 'superior' had given Eugenics a bad name, particularly after the Nazi brand of Eugenics created the Holocaust, during WWII. Sadly, what most people didn't know at that time was that Nazi eugenics was merely the full-blown application of the principles that had been developed and were openly espoused by the British, French and American Eugenics Societies.
So, Eugenics lived on, under many, heavily funded formats, one of them being Transhumanism. By and large, Transhumanism proposes to use applied science in the fields of genetics, robotics and others, to 'steer human evolution into the future'. A Transhumanist society will have, as its name implies, 'transcended humanity'. In such a society, human beings will have been replaced with hyper-efficient worker chimeras, bio-robotic warriors, and other purpose-made humanoid life forms.
These stated goals must be tied in with the bigger picture into which Eugenics and Transhumanism fit into. These fields have never been limited to 'science' per se -- they've always been primarily political and economical, and they reflect a very particular view of the world.
Under that view, the planet has limited resources, and technological advancement under free market systems cannot be trusted to overcome those limitations (one of the many Malthusian fallacies and myths) -- therefore, control must be exercised over the users of resources, to avoid any over-usage of those resources. To exercise that control, eugenicists believe they have to shut down development, and create an heavily regulated social and economic environment. In that controlled environment, those people who are alive must also be economically efficient -- i.e., produce more than they consume. So, on the one hand, the intelligentsia feels it needs to get rid of the 'wrong' sorts of people (the masses of 'unfit', 'unemployables', 'junk genes'), through techniques such as famine, abortion, sterilization, or euthanasia. On the other hand, the workers that will be allowed to go on into the future will have to be made into incrementally more 'efficient' humans -- which will eventually imply robotic add-ons and genetic-engineering.
This is none other than the worldwide, dehumanized, hyper-efficient 'hive society', that was advocated by eugenicist Charles Galton Darwin in "The Next Million Years". Or, "Our Benevolent Feudalism", as eugenicist William J. Ghent put it, in his portrayal of the techno-fascist global society that, he said, would eventually be ushered in, using the combined power of finance and science. And, of course, it was also explained in romanticized form in the "Brave New World" of Aldous Huxley, who was none other than the brother of Transhumanism founder, Eugenics Society chairman, Julian Huxley.
A neo-feudal, technocratic, new world order. That's what Eugenics and its offspring Transhumanism, strive for. A system under which you will not just lose your physical rights to independent living (and that is happening right now as this video plays), but you will also be engineered to lose your very soul. Since, as Charles Galton Darwin put it, you will be nothing more than a good worker, which includes being engineered to have the right beliefs, or no beliefs at all.
That is the final and most serious note of mental and spiritual disease behind this incredibly selfish and hypocritical paradigm. And that is why it must be stopped.
~Canadian Cyborg Documents The Reality Behind Today's Cyborg Tech: http://goo.gl/HuNJt
GENERAL DISCLAIMER: ~you can chose to look for what is useful for you ... and leave all options neutral ... to consider is not a thought-crime and even if you are an atheist, there many insights & verifiable & valid scientific sources to hear ... if you want everything 100% the way you want it ... how can you learn something new? If you narrow your options you are not only missing a chance of new (empowering) insights you also radiate the opposite of true freedom of thought ... ~certain "far out" & strange illustrations on book-covers or vidoes are for a reason. I can name 100s of authors using symbolism & art of the opponent, the adversary, the accused the exposed etc. that does NOT mean you are endorsing it or praising it . If some one use a stop-sign in traffic then you can say I do not like to stop in traffic therefore I ignore the stop sign symbol, does not make sense. The use of colorful words & symbols has always been with us to spread a message.