Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pondering the Existence of God

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
204 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 1, 2009

Tim Breen plays a philosophy student named John who is an atheist, but seeking the truth about God. With the help of his friends Mary (Claire Irving) and Peter (Joe Fortenberry), he is investigating Saint Anselm's ontological proof for God's existence.

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (vincentmilburn)

  • Awesome! My first comment! I'm not going to take up my time getting into this with you. I'd have to say the ontological argument isn't the best for proving God's existence, but if you read up on it more or talk about it with someone more knowledgeable than me, you might give it more props.

Top Comments

  • @Perrine234 Exactly. This argument deserves to be ridiculed. Theism deserves to be ridiculed, not debated.

  • You can't define a supernatural being into existence. You can't define ANYTHING into existence.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The Probability Of God's Existence
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My question isn't whether there IS or IS NOT a God.

    I don't care. If challenged, I happen to think that this is no God, or Gods.

    Even if 'God' appeared in front of me and said 'Hi, I'm God, Worship me' I wouldn't.

    I mean, who would willingly worship a being that not only created Hell, is fine with people being sent there for all eternity to be tortured.

    This kind of God must one sick SOB.

  • There is no proof for god. Faith is not evidence, and even if the bible's true (which it's not), god's been AWOL for about 2000 years. Where are the miracles? The amputees who've regrown their limbs?

  • I'm sorry, but that was just horrible. You cannot equate the concept of existence with actual existence.

    If I conceive of a unicorn, and define it as the most beautiful creature that could exist, and a creature that exists must be more beautiful than one that does not, is it then fair for me to say that unicorns must exist? Of course not. Nor can you define God into existence like this.

    The ontological argument is one of the most ridiculous arguments for God out there.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more