Coast to Coast AM - 5 of 11 - 9/11 Debate (Aug. 21, 2010)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,913
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 22, 2010

Info: http://world911truth.org - Richard Gage, from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Dave Thomas, a physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason, joined Ian Punnett for the entire program to debate the idea of controlled demolition of buildings on 9/11

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • like a giant bicycle pump? Why did the designers say that each floor was hermetically sealed to aid fire prevention?What mechanism allows air to travel through complete intact floors 30 floors down and eject debris out at the speeds witnessed? The core was not a hollow steel shaft , contrary to the Commission report lies. The core supported the gravitational load.

    What explosive hurled the girders? Exactly - gravity could not have done it - it pulls down - it does not eject laterally

  • Dave Thomas' data..."like a bi-cycle pump"... 'nuff said...give me a break...

see all

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Staring at mr thomas, from just 8 truckloads of planted explosives away, is an enhanced Al Qaeda blame-scheme - but just like with Dallas, the LN/de-bunk faction never uses these gifts - gifts which arrive via our CT research! George de Mohrenschildt - meet the Sarasota gated community Saudis! And thanks for coming out.

  • again, the explosion sounds has been recorded !!!

    both before and during the towers fell

    -- search 911 soundwaves on youtube

  • I can's take anymore of this idiotic reasoning, Ian and Dave needs to just stick their heads back in the sand. It's much better to live your life with your head in the sand and let everyone think your a stupid idiot than to open your mouth and prove it.

  • @danno88 OK, let me clarify the obvious. The other dude called me a "twoofer" and you then called me and "idiot" for pointing out ( quite obviously ) that the other guy was far more passionate about this subject than me. Listen to the video, comment if you wish but when you get so passionate that you want to start wars over it, it's time to put down the pizza box and go outside for some fresh air mate! PS. this arrived in my work email box, I am not sat on Youtube.

  • @celebritysketches Someone who has a life outside of YouTube? Where do you think you just posted your comment you idiot.

  • @mikeyt34 "Twoofer"!! I bet you're a 9/11 nut job aren't you!?! Go argue with someone who gives a s**t and stop pestering people who have lives outside of 9/11 and YouTube! "Twoofers" is a somewhat dim insult from the opposite extremist who don't realise they are extremist... of which my friend, you are one!!

  • @celebritysketches Glad you agree. The NIST report and a physics professor's research was full of scientific possibiliies whereas Gage's analysis is based on speculation and imaginary explosives that were developed and set in place in fantasy land. Finally, one of you twoofers got it right. Congrats.

  • Thermite or explosives Gage...Pick one you moron. Why can't you truthers see the flaws in his argument? Gage may sound like he's know what he is talking about, but he simply has you truthers fooled. He's a snake oil salesman and a charlatan.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more