Anybody But The Conservatives: Conservative Party vs. Liberal Party MPs.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,407
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 20, 2008

An objective look at the qualifications of Members of Parliament. MPs for the Conservative Party of Canada are compared against those in the Liberal Party of Canada.

MPs Include:
Conservative Party of Canada:
Stephen Harper,
Robert Nicholson,
Jim Flaherty,
David Emerson,
Monte Solberg.

Liberal Party of Canada:
Stephane Dion,
Michael Ignatieff,
John McCallum,
Irwin Cotler,
Bob Rae,
Raymond Chan,
Ruby Dhalla.

  • likes, 16 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • A rather noticeable bias in the amount of background information contrasting Liberal and Conservative MPs. 1 star. The word "objective" doesn't fit in this video's description.

  • i like iggy, but technically if you compare the qualifications wouldn't you rather have somebody with a masters of economics running the country rather than a social arts academic?

see all

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @182Volcom182 WIPE-OUT....Libtards are dead

  • whoever votes in this upcoming election is retarded.

    bunch a morons vote for conservative, ndp, liberals or bloc quebec.

    pathetic.

    why dont you jus make canada a dumping ground????? i feel sad for any future for our families.

    fucking retards vote for retards.

    way to go morons. everything goes up in price except my salary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!

    dont reply to my msg either i dont wanna hear any propaganda about retarded poltitical partys.

  • The KEY issue this time around is DEMOCRACY.

    Conservatives have explicitly and repeatedly demonstrated that they don't care for debate, diversity of opinion, or the democratic process.

    This makes Harper and the Conservatives dangerous politically and legally.

  • I posted a web page titled "Conservative, Liberal or Neither" by JJ Rousso

    You will be surprised (or not) learning whom both leading parties represent.

    It is on the same blog as below.

    If you are interested to an entirely different perspective....then just Google search "The History of Banking Fraud - Short Inspiring Stories by Bill Woollam"

  • @universalradio too bad he will never have a majority, that's assuming he will win!

  • @brian7125 aren't all the parties doing the same thing dumb ass!?

  • @Anchelios Not really. That;s all Harper has done. Same with Flatfoot. Unless of course you want to count the waiting to unite the right time spent at the National Citizen's Coalition. Harper's only other job? Mail room at Esso in Calgary.

  • @LivesForJihad Really whats the proof? The recent report of Sheila Fraser paints a very dark picture of conservative spending as well. and not to mention this party turned a decade of budget surplus into a 56 billion deficit. By reckless spending during G8 (he actually spent thousands and thousands of dollars building a fake lake in side the convention what a joke). The fact remains that with liberals Canadians enjoyed a decade of budget surplus.

  • @whoisthisverneguy First of all most of the prominent and highly successful PMs in Canadian politics have a law background. And Paul Martin who successfully ran as a finance minister, ending Mulroneys huge budget deficit and made Canada enjoy a decade of surplus, had a degree in history and law. So if we follow you silly logic then I would say Harper should not be voted because so far his background in economics made Canadians experience a 56 billion deficit from a surplus.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more