Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Reaction: Mass. election could cause Senate shift

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,440
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 19, 2010

A special election is taking place today in Massachusetts to find a replacement for Sen. Ted Kennedy who died last August. Polls show Republican Scott Brown ahead of Democrat Martha Coakley in that race. Will you be surprised if Brown wins? If Brown is victorious, Democrats will lose their 60-seat majority in the Senate...a shift that would allow Republicans to block the final healthcare reform bill. Would a disruption in Senate Democrats filibuster-proof majority be positive or negative? Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell called this race a referendum on healthcare reform. Do you agree?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Obama will be blamed (rightfully so) for major losses by the Dems in Congress in November 2010...he is dropping in popularity like a lead balloon

  • @lthom33: oh, contraire, Mr. Liberal...i gave you facts and you run...typical lib...Obama is going bye-byes, with a lib Congressman under each arm, and it kills you guys...too bad...Americans are overwhelmingly conservative...not liberal...you dummies....

see all

All Comments (218)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is very interesting! keep on posting :)

  • Arguing with the left is like dancing with a cypress tree. You never get anywhere and all you ever get is wet.

  • You sound like a damn Fox commentator. Full of opinions but never any facts. People like you can't be convinced with facts, so it' a waste of my time to even attempt to educate the uneducated. I don't care what you think -it' not going to change facts.

  • @lthom33:  $1.2 Trillion in "projected" deficit reduction over ten years after he just raised the deficit $3.5 Trillion in one year...WoW... LOL LOL....you're a dope!

  • @lthom33: and by the way, I don't even believe that a clueless liberal such as you really believes he'll reduce the deficit at all...lol

  • @lthom33: absolute liberal lies again...the Congressional Budget Office predicts he will get no savings over the next 10 years...he just a spender...knows no bounds....Obama is one-term president, so he knows he won't be around to hold him accountable

  • Obama' budget, which every President receives, represents fiscal sustainability: it put forward $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction over the next 10 yrs. Including war savings, the deficit "reduction" proposed in the Presidents Budget rises to $2.1 trillion but Fox wants you stupid. The transition from '08 to '09 saw the greatest annual increase in spending in the last 30 years -compliments of Bush that rat bastard.

  • @lthom33: you liberal liar...Obama more than tripled the Annual Federal Budget Deficit (did it in less than a year) and took the Gross National Debt (total debt pie) from $10 Trillion to a projected $12.8 Trillion for FY 2010. Obama has piled up the debt faster than any other president. You can run, but you can't hide liberal boy...lol

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more