Mr. Anderson dressed as / imitates Sting on iMPACT Wrestling / Scorpion Death Drop on Sting

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
32,852
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 21, 2011

Mr. Anderson/Kennedy dressed as/ imitates Sting on TNA / iMPACT Wrestling 05.19.2011 / Scorpion Death Drop on Sting

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TemaFromRussia)

  • 0:53 WTF

  • chewing gum

Top Comments

  • It's scary how Ken looked so much like Sting

see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lol do you think anderson will start dressing as the joker.... and start ripping off sting whos ripping off the joker? Then maybe in a few years down the line another guy comes up who will start ripping off Joker anderson whos ripping off joker anderson whos ripping off the joker?

  • @FantaFrancisco if you havent watched it in months, than why do you still check out videos and make time out of your valuable schedule to diss them? lol makes no sense. anyways,, i agree that WWE's corporation will always be on top, always make and put out more money. they are established, and KNOW how to run a business, and take care of their employes. and if you get fired or released.. well,, you obviously didnt do your job as asked lol.

  • i'd rather spend $50.00 on a WWE PPV, rather than ever paying $10-15 for a TNA ticket.

  • @plants305 Look up what facts? You're calling me a kiddo but you still watch WRESTLING. I haven't watched it in months. Once again, its you're opinion. Facts show WWE makes more money.

  • @FantaFrancisco tna is better action wise unlike wwe, who could give 2 shits about the wrestling. look up the facts, kiddo

  • @plants305 Cena was much liked and was a rising star. There are people and analysts who look out for these rising stars and turn them into stars. Kennedy wasn't one of them and that is why they didn't match TNA's offering price. Look at WWE now and what Cena has accomplished. Now go look at TNA's "Mr. Kennedy". No one knows who he even is. If TNA is much better, why is that?

  • @FantaFrancisco whatever/ cena was handed EVERYTHING

  • @plants305 Handed to them? Cena is a huge draw to WWE in terms of making money and that's all they care about. Sorry if it doesn't please you but big corporations aren't going to change something just because you feel its boring. They make money off of him, they'll continue making money off of him. Kennedy's act was annoying and his microphone hiatus was getting more annoying each show.

  • @FantaFrancisco the're not given, there handed them because they are fucking marks. cena never did anything impressive with his career and doesn't deserve to be at the top. at least tna has different people at the top, which is a nice change of scenery

  • @plants305 Look at you cursing like a big boy. Once again, I can care less about wrestling. Either way, its scripted and boring. But to say TNA draws more fans than WWE is just a joke. Kennedy had multiple chances but he was not a popular superstar. Popular superstars are given the opportunity such as John Cena or Randy Orton. Keep calling me a kiddy because you're acting like one and you also can't write in a proper English format.

  • @FantaFrancisco oh my god are you fucking retarded? they NEVER gave guys like him the proper chance there. because, again, it's all about them shoving superfag cena down our throats. and audience wise? i'd rather have a small wrestling crowd who knows what's going on rather than a wwe audience full of little kiddies, obviously of which you are, and soccer mom bitches with no REAL appreciation. so shut you're fucking mouth you putrid fucking cunt

  • they should tag team lolz

  • @plants305 Great draw for who? No one cared about this guy in the WWE and if they thought he was so great of a draw, WWE would have gave him an opportunity. Look at the audience compared to WWE; its a joke. Funny how you don't comment on the hash tag... Cause you found out you're the dumbass hypocrite there? WWE>TNA, and this is coming from someone who doesn't watch either of those. I just watch it when there's nothing else to watch but it doesn't take a smart guy to know that.

  • @FantaFrancisco tna sucks? wwe has the one woman who's a great wrestler and put her in a farting gimmick? and you have the balls to say tna sucks? kennedy is a GREAT draw because he has talent on mic and ring. the best? no. but again, he wasn't used right, as a majority of the tna roster. you're retarded

  • @plants305 I can't tell if you're stupid or something because you were the one who started using hash tags, not me. Holy hell, how stupid are you? Kennedy wasn't a draw because he wasn't entertaining. They got offered more money by TNA( which wrestler would deny more money? ). Hardy was laid off because he was given multiple chances by the WWE and continued violating his contract. I don't even watch WWE and even I know the business part of this. TNA sucks and you're an idiot.

  • @FantaFrancisco yeah. kennedy wasnt a draw because they were to busy shoving cena superfag down our throats. Angle was great, hardy was great, but they didnt get offered more money. it's because wwe became a lame ass pg piece of shit show. kennedy never had a chance. #onlyfaggotsusehashtagsotherth­antwitter

  • @plants305 Angle never had a chance? Kennedy never had a chance? Jeff Hardy never had a chance? Rethink it again. These wrestlers were released from WWE because TNA offered them more $ in which WWE found was not necessary since they were aging stars. Also from the fact that Jeff Hardy brought a negative image to the WWE and Kennedy wasn't much of a draw. #nofuckingduh

  • @FantaFrancisco they rely on ex wwe superstars who never have a chance to shine because they keep shoving cena the superfag down our throats and will probably never be used right. #nofuckingduh

  • @plants305 I state facts, you state a fantasy. The market of WWE has never been bigger and it doesn't seem likely that TNA will surpass WWE anytime soon. If TNA was so good, why do they continuously rely on having to hire ex WWE superstars? Because they know that WWE is well known and people may follow them. 

  • @FantaFrancisco are you kidding me? wwe was small like TNA once. as for better in ring action, i laugh at that. I likt seeing diffrent people with UNIQUE main events instead of a boring as 1 on 1 or a tag tem. its boring and gay. TNA makes it seem like a resoectable sport.

  • @plants305 WWE makes more in 3 months than TNA makes in a year. They have more fans, more PPV's, more wrestlers, more popular, better superstars who can act and not make it look fake unlike TNA, and also much more exciting. TNA will never beat WWE. Not even close.

  • @FantaFrancisco ok.....but it's sad when they have to get probably the most popular wwe wrestler from the best era ever just to boost ratings........wwe ratings are like as low as ever

  • @plants305 One appearance from The Rock and TNA shits bricks when comparing ratings.

  • @plants305 So TNA WILL eventualy compete with wwe. everyone said TNA will be out of business by 2008. it's 2012 and it's strong as ever. plus tna shows blood. thank you

  • everyone forgets wwe was a small company at one point. This is what i want to see, great segments, enjoyable (not great) storylines, and WRESTLINg. not fucking dance contests inside of a fucking wrestling ring. wwe could give 2 shits about its wrestling fans and appeal to little kid fags and soccer mom bitches and SHOVE john "superfag"cena down our throas while TNA has different people as world champions. plus, TNA has a respectable women's division and a WAY better tag team division then wwe.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more