Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

OGDN 7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
91 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 25, 2007

'You can't disprove God'.

OGDN (Official God Debate Network) Intro Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxrvYvcElHc

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jamezmon)

  • Once again you use an abstract conception to defend "disproving God." Who cares about a pot orbiting around the galaxy. I ask you disprove "love." I ask you disprove the emotion of "fear". You can't see them, but you sure as heck know that they exist. This is circular reasoning. Not evidence of God's "nonexistence." God is so real and His fingerprints are on our souls, in creation. In your passion against injustice. BTW. Who cares if ya smoke, bro.

  • If you don't get the teapot then you don't get the argument. You can verify that love and fear exist by asking ANYONE on the planet. You can't verify that the judao-christian god exists by asking everyone on the planet. It's not circular reasoning, come up with a decent counter-argument.

  • Who would get the teapot argument, it's as lame as the "spaghetti monster" that you forged from Richard Dawkins book. You don't need to ask everyone on the planet about love. It's innate in our nature that we long for love, we fear being in love, and yet we crave to stay in love. The christian theologians have argued about God outside of our existance because that's where the atheist' stand about God. it's never personal with an atheist, it's always seperate from humanity.

  • fuck you. I independently came up with a pink elephant argument in my philosophy class, only to discover the parellel spaghetti monster. the teapot, pink elephant, invisible pink unicorn, and teapot argument are all the same idea, you simply don't understand it. there's nothing impersonal about atheism, i honestly dont want to talk to you anymore. you use okay words for a spazzy theist, but you still just don't 'see' it. i'm sure you'd say the same about me, so let's leave it there.

  • Why does nearly every atheist on YT smoke? There was a list someone posted and it nearly had every well known atheist YTuber. Very weird. Must be something about brain structure or philosophy or something. I know some Christians smoke, but I haven't seen a single cigarette in a Christian video yet. I wonder what that means? I would have thought atheists would be more protective of the one life they expect to have.

  • what a substantial argument. P0WNED!

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • bro. I'm not going to leave having a conversation about God with you. I won't convert you. I just think that there's something deeper than your philosophy class. That's all. I wont comment if you don't want me to. But if you want to talk about anything,bro, you know how to find me. I'm not spazzy, just passionate about a God who loves even when if it kills Him.. peace bro.

  • Conclusions that there is no God, is not based upon fact, nor logic. It's based upon an atheist' personal experience with christians or conflicts they have with reading the scripture. All these emotions are hidden behind books and studies of scientists and philosophers who have their own indifference toward christianity. An atheist doesn't care if someone is Buddhist or Hindu, but the minute someone is christian they have an issue with religion, concluding that all christians are religious..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more