Dr. Patrick Moore on Greenpeace and Anti-Nukes
Top Comments
All Comments (80)
-
If all the anti people would offer a workable source it would be different but they just complain about everything, they are negative and not useful at all. Perhaps in the far future new sources of energy will be found but for now mankind needs oil and nuclear energy to survive.
-
@granddad2002 you should probably add a 5th to that. Zionist new world order conspiracy theories.
-
Greenpeace is an antimodernistic religious sect ...
-
There are 4 debates that I don't get into 1.The Moon Hoax 2. Creation Science 3. Holocaust Deniers 4. Anti-Nuclear ! Personally, I have no problems with Solar, Wind or conservation. These technologies are useful in niche markets. I'm a fan of Geothermal and biofuels... they are better with boarder application. But kilogram to meters cubed... Nuclear and its reasonable advances are amazing. Unless somebody can make an orbital tower in the next 20 years.. Nuclear is a solid bet.
-
@Stefnir94 - yes there's loads of uranium justnow, but as a source of power generation it's retarded. why do you listen to things that ignore the fact you are a human with a biological body, living on a planet with a water-based ecosystem you entirely rely upon operating correctly? why all this threat to life itself - as if in their minds some people think they are actually mechanical entiies who are immortal...that can plug nuke rods into them for power.
-
@MannySteinerBleeky His name is authentic, check Wikipedia.
-
I wouldn't put it past the pro-nuke conspiracy to change this guys name just so it conflicts with the astronomers.
-
i have one name Nikola Tesla moore think about him , free clean energie. they make money one nuclair power its only money.
-
Go Nuclear Power...free us of the greenhouse gas and fossil fuel!!
Anti-nuclear people are retarded and backward
yann33fr 1 year ago 13
there is enough uranium in the ocean to produce nuclear energy for another 3000 years.
Stefnir94 3 years ago 11