The thorough rebuttal video to the so-called rebuttal Atheist video...to the first Theist video to make "an Atheist's head explode". Each statement and silly belch of this dorky Atheist drone-tard is addressed and picked apart...one by one.
@jokesonyouhaha2 (3rd) (real) scientists are not devils. Fanatical Darwinists are though. And fanatical Darwinists are NOT "scientists". They're philosophers and neurotic speculators. And pathological idiots and liars. And, kiddo, that aint the same. Scientists and biologists were Creationists and Theists, before Darwin the dumbbell destroyed true empirical testable science, and substituted it with his conjectural mythical garbage, leaps, exaggerations, and hallucinations.
@jokesonyouhaha2 (2nd) if demons existed (if you knew for real what a "demon" actually is, bright boy), spirit beings, etc, then that would mean that things BEYOND the "matieral world" and that PARANORMAL SUPER-NATURAL ENTITIES, BEINGS, AND THINGS exist. Which would mean that the Almighty Spirit God PROBABLY exists too (because did SPIRIT demons "evolve" from material chemicals too? lol) and that Armageddon and Judgment MAY also exist too. And Dawkins and you can't have THAT.
@jokesonyouhaha2 I don't waste time with rude psychotic disrespectful TROLLS. The evidence is there, even if you're too blind, too dumb, too dishonest, too entrenched, and too warped to see it. When you say "every single case" in that book is "coincidence" when you have not even seen "every single case" in your "skimming" or dug deep into all the ins and outs, details, and facts and issues in each case, you show what a biscuit head you are, and I won't waste anymore time on you.
@sweetmikser Well since they don't exist, and there's zero evidence of their existence, your raging butthurt point is moot. :) BTW, even if demons did exist, that doesn't mean god exists. And it certainly doesn't mean ancient anthropomorphic fairytale depictions of god are true, or that creationist failtrolling pseudoscience is legit. You got a shit ton more work to do, sparky. Better put your helmet back on.
@sweetmikser Still no scientific reference. One would think given your fetish for slapping the word "scientific" on your claims, that you'd provide at least one scientific reference. /fail
@jokesonyouhaha1 (3rd) and no, I don't believe you that you'd "LOVE there to be evidence of the paranormal". Because regardless of your claim that you think it'd be cool, deep down it would kinda rattle you that "spirits" or "demons" exist, because that would mean that GOD HIMSELF exists, and that would mean maybe that the BIBLICAL Jehovah exists, and that there could be something to intelligent design, creation, and JUDGMENT. And no committed Atheist deep down wants that.
@jokesonyouhaha1 (2nd) but kept re-appearing. That's just one of THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of examples of weird "scientifically" UNexplainable ghostly ghastly spiritistic paranormal supernatural things occurring in life. Objects moving through the air across the room. Noises that SIMPLY SCIENTIFICALLY should not be there, yet paranormally are. And your pathetic laughable "peer reviews" won't bother if in a cocoon of GROUP THINK that in bias does not want these things to occur.
@jokesonyouhaha1 ayayaya, you can't be cool or civil or reasonable for 5 seconds. Even though I tried with you. Listen. There's just so much space on these comment boxes to elaborate much, and I got tired of dealing with you, so didn't bother on another box. This is documented. Burn marks of a dead dude, that ALL KINDS OF METHODS to remove it, that removed other burn marks, and scientifically THEY said, after all that was done to remove, the marks shouldn't be there anymore,
@jokesonyouhaha2 (3rd) (real) scientists are not devils. Fanatical Darwinists are though. And fanatical Darwinists are NOT "scientists". They're philosophers and neurotic speculators. And pathological idiots and liars. And, kiddo, that aint the same. Scientists and biologists were Creationists and Theists, before Darwin the dumbbell destroyed true empirical testable science, and substituted it with his conjectural mythical garbage, leaps, exaggerations, and hallucinations.
sweetmikser 4 days ago
@jokesonyouhaha2 (2nd) if demons existed (if you knew for real what a "demon" actually is, bright boy), spirit beings, etc, then that would mean that things BEYOND the "matieral world" and that PARANORMAL SUPER-NATURAL ENTITIES, BEINGS, AND THINGS exist. Which would mean that the Almighty Spirit God PROBABLY exists too (because did SPIRIT demons "evolve" from material chemicals too? lol) and that Armageddon and Judgment MAY also exist too. And Dawkins and you can't have THAT.
sweetmikser 4 days ago
@jokesonyouhaha2 I don't waste time with rude psychotic disrespectful TROLLS. The evidence is there, even if you're too blind, too dumb, too dishonest, too entrenched, and too warped to see it. When you say "every single case" in that book is "coincidence" when you have not even seen "every single case" in your "skimming" or dug deep into all the ins and outs, details, and facts and issues in each case, you show what a biscuit head you are, and I won't waste anymore time on you.
sweetmikser 4 days ago
Now go on and block this username as well. I trust your flaming ignorant retorts will speak for themselves. :)
jokesonyouhaha2 4 days ago
@sweetmikser Well since they don't exist, and there's zero evidence of their existence, your raging butthurt point is moot. :) BTW, even if demons did exist, that doesn't mean god exists. And it certainly doesn't mean ancient anthropomorphic fairytale depictions of god are true, or that creationist failtrolling pseudoscience is legit. You got a shit ton more work to do, sparky. Better put your helmet back on.
jokesonyouhaha2 4 days ago
@sweetmikser ...aaaaaand STILL no scientific reference. lol
Oh wait, that's right. Scientists are teh devilz. You have to belieeeeeeeeve! lulz
jokesonyouhaha2 4 days ago
@sweetmikser Still no scientific reference. One would think given your fetish for slapping the word "scientific" on your claims, that you'd provide at least one scientific reference. /fail
jokesonyouhaha2 4 days ago
@jokesonyouhaha1 (3rd) and no, I don't believe you that you'd "LOVE there to be evidence of the paranormal". Because regardless of your claim that you think it'd be cool, deep down it would kinda rattle you that "spirits" or "demons" exist, because that would mean that GOD HIMSELF exists, and that would mean maybe that the BIBLICAL Jehovah exists, and that there could be something to intelligent design, creation, and JUDGMENT. And no committed Atheist deep down wants that.
sweetmikser 4 days ago
@jokesonyouhaha1 (2nd) but kept re-appearing. That's just one of THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of examples of weird "scientifically" UNexplainable ghostly ghastly spiritistic paranormal supernatural things occurring in life. Objects moving through the air across the room. Noises that SIMPLY SCIENTIFICALLY should not be there, yet paranormally are. And your pathetic laughable "peer reviews" won't bother if in a cocoon of GROUP THINK that in bias does not want these things to occur.
sweetmikser 4 days ago
@jokesonyouhaha1 ayayaya, you can't be cool or civil or reasonable for 5 seconds. Even though I tried with you. Listen. There's just so much space on these comment boxes to elaborate much, and I got tired of dealing with you, so didn't bother on another box. This is documented. Burn marks of a dead dude, that ALL KINDS OF METHODS to remove it, that removed other burn marks, and scientifically THEY said, after all that was done to remove, the marks shouldn't be there anymore,
sweetmikser 4 days ago