Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Laffer Curve, Part I: Understanding the Theory

The Laffer Curve charts a relationship between tax rates and tax revenue. While the theory behind the Laffer Curve is widely accepted, the concept has become very controversial because politicians ...  
 
Customize

More From: afq2007

The Laffer Curve, Part III: Dynamic Scoring (old version)7:05
9,254 views
The Laffer Curve, Part II: Reviewing the Evidence7:28
17,780 views
Flat Tax vs. National Sales Tax5:49
18,729 views
The Global Flat Tax Revolution6:03
22,016 views
Senator Obama's Social Security Tax Plan9:15
20,874 views
The Laffer Curve, Part III: Dynamic Scoring7:05
3,064 views
Tax Competition:  A Liberalizing Force in the World Economy8:24
17,515 views
Tax Havens: Myths vs. Facts9:56
18,569 views
Moving Beyond the Fake Stimulus: Reviewing Policies that Produce Real Growth6:13
18,786 views
Tax Tyranny3:02
5,345 views
President Obama's Dishonest Demagoguery on So-Called Tax Havens4:20
14,865 views
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Anti-Money Laundering Laws2:03
1,198 views
Dan Mitchell's Tax Haven Speech on Capitol Hill -- Part 29:45
2,840 views
Don't Turn America Into Another France3:03
30,074 views
Government Intervention, Regulatory Policy, and the Financial Crisis7:19
7,270 views
Something Scientific: Ethanol4:15
2,799 views
Want Less Corruption? Shrink the Size of Government5:40
28,116 views
President Obama's Deferral Proposal: Hamstringing American Companies, Reducing American Jobs9:04
16,398 views
Gobierno Grande No Es Estímulo: Por Qué Keynes Estaba Equivocado (La Versión Condensada)3:55
2,958 views
Five Key Reasons to Reject  Class-Warfare Tax Policy8:47
18,817 views

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
188 ratings
Sign in to rate
50,276 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (128)   Options

Loading...
redSHIFT69 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
try an IQ curve, looks like you are on the left side of the hill
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
davebot900 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I find it interesting, gummoboy69, that you do not dispute that a country will collect more revenue if the top tax rate is at an optimal rate, but instead you are concerned that the top earners are making mroe as a percentage of the whole than before. So I ask you, what is it that you don't like, more government revenue (so we can pay for programs helping the poor) or income equality (meaning all are equally poor)?
gummoboy69 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
The optimal rate of taxation for the top marginal earners should be MUCH higher than it is now. The more top earners make, and the less they are taxed-the direction we've been moving in for thirty years-the less money we have to fund anything. Which is more or less what the Laffer/Reaganomics folks wanted: Starve the beast. Kill social spending, dismantle safety nets, etc. And then claim they were forced to because there wasn't enough revenue.
happyventure (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
davebot90, the whole question surrounding the Laffer's curve theory is "Where is that optimal tax point" on the curve?

How do you know we're not already to the left of it with so many tax cuts over the past decade?

Evidence: Bush tax cuts never paid for itself. CAD gov did a study on tax cut & concluded that only 30% of the lost rev came back to their coffers after each one of their tax cuts in late 90's. That's what both Greenspan and Bernanke told congress when asked the same question.
gummoboy69 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
The share of the nations income flowing to the top one-tenth of 1 percent of households increased from 7.3 percent of the total income in the nation in 2002 to 12.3 percent in 2007. This is the highest level in the Piketty-Saez data going back to 1913, surpassing even the previous peak in 1928!
gummoboy69 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Income gains have been even more pronounced among those at the very top of the income scale. The incomes of the top one-tenth of 1 percent (0.1 percent) of U.S. households have grown more rapidly than the incomes of the top 1 percent of households as a whole, rising by 94 percent — or $3.5 million per household — since 2002.
gummoboy69 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
What the proponents of Laffer's theories have given us is a country where the top 1% of incomes took home about 8% of the pie in around 1980. Today that number is around 23%!
I
gummoboy69 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
The tax rate had actually been higher than 70% on the upper incomes and it did not sink the economy. During the peak years of US prosperity after WWII upper tax rates were in the mid-to-high 80's.
Exlor (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Enforcement was probably looser as well. Accounting was less developed. Swiss banking secret was stronger.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.