Yakovlev Yak-141 NATO Code: Freestyle

cant take off with full fuel tank? cant carry weapons? I would like to see sources of that. Made up crap by you is not enough.

It is a fact that usa came to russia to buy the designs, taking advantage of ussr breakdown and everything sold for scrap, they cheaply bought the design and upgraded the engines to a version of their own.

f35 is a worst piece of shit ever did you know??? ok here goes, I will ruin your belief for eternity:

watch:

f35 useless.

proven by AUS air force.

Never talk again. I have never heard so much bullshit spewed i one post in my whole life. Look it up yourself, the YAK 141 has serious trouble taking off vertically with a full fuel tank, it's almost common knowledge. And if you think the F-35 is useless, well, I have nothing to say to you, because you are obviously blinded by propaganda or a complete fool.

my sincere apologies, I seem to have confused the yak 141 with the yak 38. Similar planes, both with VTOL. Still though theres a reason no Airforce fields the 141

I do not THINK that the f35 is useless, it has been PROVEN by australian air force.

did you watch the video ?

well it speaks for itself.
f35 lost to training with chinese (and remember their poor quality)
clones of su27 and russian s27 (also bought by chinese, a bit better).
so there you go. f35 sucks as the aussies state. and if they say it sucks, it does.

yak was not fielded because lack of fund, not because of design.

anyhow, its legacy was carried on to f35.

That test was the biggest load of false propaganda biased bullshit ever. Where should start?

we should start at you being in denial?
thank you very much.

propaganda from australians? fuck, they are like second USA in the world.

most of the f35s are sold there.
so no, it was from a news report, and the f35 does suck.
yak has done the same thing 35 years ago.

and for all people that say yak copies harrier, look at the yak36, made b4 harrier was even on face of planet.

f35 sucks. proven fact.

Your a dumbass, proven fact, thank you very much.

First off, everything about the Wargame is highly classified. They probally put 20 sukhois against like two F-35's, after seeing the F-22 get a 50/1 KD at red flag. I guarantee when real information on the tests surface everyone will realize it was a load of crap to make the F-35 look bad. I guarantee the tests were extremely biased. We shall see, and I'll prove you wrong.

1. doubltful that Aus (which is like 2nd USA ) will say false shit publically.
2. doubt that a news report with an Aus airforce tell lies.
3.f35's rate of climb, speed , manouvrebility, payload cant even be a quarter of very first gen su27s.
it is more realistic to say 2 su37 and 50 f35s.

f22 getting 50/1 kill ratio? BS. prove that. you coudnt prove anything from beginning.

if it was a chinese guy to say f35 sucks, I would believe it.
australians saying it is different.

F-35 can't train with PRC, it haven;t even made it into production. But I agree it sucks. For a bomber it carries only 2 JDAM/Paveway. For air combat carries 2 to max 4 Aim-120. Weight as much as F-105, Low cruising speed, low top speed/climb rate, high wing loading. Stealth can give F35 first shot, but under Jamming and evasion, AIM120 kill probability will be at best 50% with 4 missile volley. that's all the BVR you got, what then? do the dog fight with Flanker?

whats useless is your mind.. throw it in the trash