William Lane Craig Leaves a Chair Open for Richard Dawkins (Mirror: Birdieupon)
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
I've seen people whining on Dawkins website, about a New Statesman article which mentioned that even atheists admitted that Hitchens lost his debate with Craig. The hot-heads on there screaming about how Hitchens "destroyed" Craig and how the NS "cannot be trusted" or was "biased" was simply pathetic.
Some atheists simply get their heads so far up their hero's behind that they can't see the debate.
-
@thecosmosisgreat Uh, yeah, Craig never gives evidence for his premises like the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or the BVG Theorem. Nothing gets passed you.
Video Responses
All Comments (712)
-
7:38 is priceless... Hahaha
-
i dont believe in god myself but i still really enjoy hearing dr. craigs intellectual responses
-
Richard Dawkins like many of the "new atheists" trot the same old arguments against theism that has been refuted centuries ago! they bring nothing "new" to the table.The "new atheists" have turned atheism into a religion complete with dogma and kool-aid! it's become an abomination in the face of logic and reason! Dr.Craig and Mr.Dawkins needs 5 minutes alone.
"you wage your war of nerves but you can't crush the kingdom!" PANTERA
-
he didn't show up
-
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
-
Atheists can ultimately never win this. It's the nature of philosophical debate itself... just move on... He expects a theological answer? Cough cough... the theologians for close to 2000 years now have been pointing at the philosophers: "They will answer that for us."
Believe or don't, the mistake thinking evidence and 'serious' arguments can decide for you is an old one. I feel fine just saying : "I just don't have faith, if you really want to convince me, just pray for me... ok?"
Okay Craig, here is a personal invitation for you to debate with me, If you don't show up however I will be forced to call you a coward, and I will have another chair for God, and if neither of you show up. Well you're just wrong.
Your arguments can be dissected by a fifteen year-old, you're nothing but a showman and have the characteristics of a Career Politician and a Charlatan.
TheAsymmetrical 2 months ago
@TheAsymmetrical Craig doesn't go around saying he'll debate ANYBODY about the existence of God (while not caring what they believe). Get it? Attempt to read behind the headlines: watch?v=80qsbsuuZjc. Furthermore, Craig has a policy where he only debates people with PhDs (although he'll make rare exceptions). It wouldn't make sense for Craig to debate a pizza delivery body, would it. Please, try to be fair. Your IQ is that of a 15-year-old's.
drcraigvideos 2 months ago
Who says the universe began to exist?
TrachyBasalt 4 months ago
@TrachyBasalt Science.
drcraigvideos 4 months ago 10
@drcraigvideos Did it? I thought time was thought to be infinite, therefore the universe didn't start, just constantly changes, expanding and contracting under the laws of physics. Silly me.
sids500 3 months ago
@sids500 Indeed. You should also look up the Borde Guth Vilenkin model which shows the universe must have a beginning. So, does the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
drcraigvideos 3 months ago 3