Mikhail Grabovski Dirty Spin-O-Rama Shootout Goal

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,041
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 7, 2010

Mikhail Grabovski caps the Maple Leafs 5-4 comeback against the Capitals, with this amazing Spin-O-Rama shootout winner.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (leafspc)

  • so this is an awesome play, but Omarks "spin-o-rama" 50 feet from Ellis is disrespectful?

  • @Zwixon ya because grabovski did the move to put it in the net, he's also a 4th year Vet. Omark is a ROOKIE doing the move just to show off. You gotta have respect being a rookie in the league.

  • @leafspc Let Omark do his thing. Everyone has their own style. Ovechkin does a lot of disrespectful things but everyone loves him. If Omark wants to spin at center ice, let him.

  • @BenjaminCoversSongs i hate ovechkin, and he's not a rookie is he...

  • @BenjaminCoversSongs oh , and he gets about 100 points a year... omark has like 2

  • @leafspc you are a fucking idiot. leafs suck and so does garbageovski

  • @Wi3dMaN i looked at your channel and lold, everyone hates you, so i wont even give you a witty response.

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Shawnaldo75 oh ok

  • @KingCrazyman2011... not "cheap shot dirty" is... "sneaky dirty"... made the goalie look stupid.

  • what the fuck how is this a dirty shootout goal?

  • NHL 10 glitch goal....

  • @DzekoSucks Your education level (or lack thereof) speaks for itself by the simple fact that you find these words "big" and not used on a daily basis.

  • @GovOfWolves I don't think you seem to understand that attempting to use words that you don't use on a daily basis doesn't make you seem any smarter. I'm fairly sure i'm more educated than you yet you don't see me pulling out my arsenal of words and trying to act smart. Inferiority complex? probably.

  • @DzekoSucks Sorry if you find "I.Q." and "threshold" too "big" to comprehend (sorry, is that word too big?). However, you might find a dictionary helpful. Interestingly enough, the AAMD set the "I.Q. threshold" for mental retardation at < 85 and you lack the ability to even understand the term.

  • @GovOfWolves I love how you're trying to use big words that don't even fit the context of what you're saying. "you fall below the IQ threshold" LOL.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more