Richard Dawkins: Has Technology Changed Human Evolution?
Top Comments
All Comments (309)
-
@PutrydByle I personally believe that we have evolved to a point where manual genetic engineering will take over. I don't particularly like the idea of parents choosing what their children look like, but if it can be used to wipe out defects then I say that is a good thing.
-
Nasa says, too, a Hiroshima sized bomb dropped in the upper atmosphere above heartland America will cause our entire electrical grid to fail So what was your "poster boy" scientists thinking knowing the danger of unshielded electronics... Our military: less than 5% of hardware used can survive an EMP attack or burst. Within 30 days of total grid failure, millions will start to die (no fuel pump, waterpump, rotted food, no water, riots, mayhem, anarchy..." That's science for you.
-
Chew on this anti-theists: science could very well have brought mankind into the brink of extinction. The issue is EMP, of which NASA heavily warns is the most likely doomsday scenario... scientists proved a hypothesis Enrico Fermi had that EMP would be the result of a nuclear weapon. We have known about this since 1953. Now, science fails: instead of controlling the frailty of items that use micro electronics, we are set up for a massive upheaval if and WHEN a gamma ray burst hits us AGAIN.
-
His points are valid enough, but he doesn't really address the question. I'd be very interested to hear what someone with his expertise has to say about potential technological influences on current and future human evolutionary developments.
-
@k8k8k8er Okay, I remember this now. Wow, it HAS been a while! As I have yet to do my own research on this particular scenario, I choose to refrain from answering at this time. I hope that you understand.
-
@Patience1138 this is from the assumpsion that if according to the bible, torah or quaran the world was covered completely by water and only noah was able to gather EVERY animal onto his boat. and if he landed somewhere in mideast, then there should be an evidence of ALL animals living or migrating from mideast to their various location that they occupy today. and theres aboslutely no evidence of a polar bear or kangaro being in mideast or the route from mideast to north pole or australia.
-
We ARE evolving... through technology. We are becoming cyborgs. We are already dependent upon technology to survive. If you don't believe me, try sleeping naked in a cave, then go find some food to survive until tomorrow.
ALL OTHER mammals can do such things very easily... except we humans find it very difficult. We would have mass extinctions without cars and WalMart. In fact, money itself is a human invention.
-
@k8k8k8er lol I don't even remember what this is from.
-
@Patience1138 sorry i have no idea what u r refering to?
if u r refering to the supposet migration of kangaros from mideast to austrailia or the polar bear from mideast to north pole. then i have to say that is just rediculous, a there is no evidence of their existance in mideast or their migration from there. i hope this answer ur question. just imagining a polar bear in mideast is ridiculous enough. lol
Woah, he's 68?
MikeEmery9 1 year ago 55
It gets tedious how people work so hard trying to present ridicules suppositions showing how evolution is a hoax? I'm not asking that healthy skepticism be suspended but you should at least open your eyes and allow yourself to see the real evidence. Ones who deny the obvious do not make evolution false but rather bring themselves ignorance.
b991228 1 year ago 9