George W. Bush On '' The Tonight Show (11/18/2010) (part 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
65,926
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2010

you got to give it to Leno here, Leno is a pretty liberal guy, from Massachusetts, yet he shows no sign at all of partisanship, which is sadly rare.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 44 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (268)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrTomRogan btw I think George Bush did a couple of good things - Born Alive Infant Protection Act and not signing the ridiculous Kyoto Protocol. Sadly, I feel they are dwarfed by the bad things.

    Peace.

  • @MrTomRogan I want Americans to defend their country and stand up for freedom, the trouble is most people don't seem to realise - the true enemy is within.

    In the case of your country the enemies own the Federal Reserve, loan the government money at interest, and the government has to steal money (taxation) from the population to pay the interest. The principal can not be repaid. That is why you are $16 trillion in debt.

    When your government defaults it's gonna be Armaggedon.

  • @historypoliticsbb Because it is badly researched and rooted in partisan analysis. Killing innocent people is wrong. What are we scared of? Nothing. But we are determined to defend our country and stand up for the ideal of freedom across the world.

  • @MrTomRogan Why is Perkins' book absurd? Because it makes the US military out to be something other than heroes?

    Killing innocent people is always wrong. That is a clear difference in morality between us. The US seems to be the only nation on earth that needs to be constantly at war thousands of miles away from its borders in order to defend itself. What are you scared of exactly? Al Qaeda?

  • @historypoliticsbb Or instead of Perkins absurd book you could read around the subject a little more.. Saddam was supported in the Qassim killing by CIA fundraising support. This support did not extend to operational control of Saddam into the 60s.

    In Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya the US took action, authorised under US law (and international law of self defense in the case of the later 3). The civilian deaths in those conflicts were not the result of a calculated intention to kill.

  • @MrTomRogan 1) Saddam Hussein was a CIA agent. Search 'Saddam Hussein CIA' on Google and there are thousands of reputable results. Alternatively read John Perkins' 'Confessions of an Economic Hitman'.

    2) Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, how many wars do you want me to name? These murders were illegal in these countries. You never asked their permission to kill them. You can't legalize tyranny. By your measure the Holocaust wasn't murder.

  • @historypoliticsbb 1) That Saddam Hussein was a CIA agent. He wasn't. The coup was internal.

    2) The US has murdered more people than any other country. No we haven't. Murder is the unlawful act of killing. What are your examples of where the US govt authorised unlawful acts of killing?

  • @MrTomRogan Which one's are false, help me out.

  • @historypoliticsbb So stupid. You try and sounds so clever but in fact your arguments are completely false. OR cognitively dissonant as you might say.

  • George Bush is a decent guy. I like him. I'm not American. Never been to America. But I like him. And feel that a lot of the heat he got was ill placed.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more