Moon Landing Hoax - Apollo 13 Trajectory - Jarrah Debunk
Uploader Comments (LandingApollo)
Top Comments
-
This has to be the greatest pwnage of Jarrah on YouTube... and that's saying something, since he's had his ass handed to him that many times, his legs are in danger of falling off.
-
I am the narrator you idiot :) It is nice to see that in you case, at 46 years of age, you are living proof that age does not equal experience or knowledge. 46 years and still thick as pig shit, you should be proud :)
Video Responses
All Comments (567)
-
@DeadJesus100 Oh dear...
-
I know, it's incredible. Jarrah is studying astrophysics and he did not understand that Apollo 13 returned on a free return trajectory. I'm afraid little Jarrah put too much faith in Ralph Rene, a man that showed he did not understand orbital mechanics.
-
@DeadJesus100 You are a sad, deluded fool. Jarrah has been debunked time after time. The fact that he doesn't even know that Apollo 13 got back to earth on a free return trajectory that needed nothing more than minor course corrections and its own momentum tells us all we need to know about his level of knowledge.
-
Fake it to the moon
Nazi Apollo
Jarrah has shown you nasa hoaxsters what liars you are
-
Apollo is fake. I have never seen this "moon" thing they say they landed on. The moon was made up by the US government so they could fake 9/11.
id like to ask a few questions please, seeing as there is a qualified physicist here.....firstly how did they shield against the van allen belt?, secondly how come there is no crater beneath the landing craft (apollo 11) even though thrusters were used to touch down, thirdly who was it that took that awesome sweeping footage of the return pod ejecting from the lander base?
whackitov 1 month ago
@whackitov Difficult with limited characters, but for the Van Allen belts: 1) The spacecraft moved through the belts in four hours, and they were protected from the IONIZING radiation by the aluminium hull. The orbital transfer trajectory through the belts was plotted to give as little exposure as possible. Dr James Van Allen who discovered the belts rebutted claims that the radiation levels were too dangerous - this should speak volumes!
LandingApollo 1 month ago
@whackitov 2) There shouldn't be a crater. The descent system was throttled down by a massive amount during the final seconds, basically enough to support the landers own weight. The pressure put out by the engine nozzle (bearing in mind that it expands much quicker in a vacuum than on earth) was hitting the Moon at 1.5psi. Not a lot at all, thus no crater. What it do do we scatter a lot of fine surface dust, and certain photos show scouring, google as11psr.pdf and go to page 95 onwards
LandingApollo 1 month ago
@whackitov 3) It was a camera on the Lunar Rover that could be remotely controlled from Earth. It was panned up back from Mission control. Hope this answers your questions :)
LandingApollo 1 month ago