The Watchmaker Fallacy
Uploader Comments (nnocturne)
All Comments (32)
-
@Undertaker202 ...and the latter would be a fine choice to make! very unlikely things DO happen, yknow. being struck by lightning? relatively unlikely. winning the lottery? even less likely, but they both happen. a lot of people don't seem to understand probability. if the not only spontaneous, but ONGOING development of universal laws and processes happens by slim chance, then, well, everything is here to give evidence for that! there is NO proof of a god. at all.
-
great vid, i don't get the hate at all... weird
-
God loves you , and did love you before the world was formed.
-
boy and then they said smoking pot don't damage the brain.......
-
wait, at 2:12 you appeal to molecular physics which are subject to laws of nature relevant to chemistry, but who made those laws? Why and how are those laws in affect? When and how did they start? They unto them selves are proof of design, unless you believe they are products of chance.
-
I like how people argue that god had to have had a creator, but completly ignor that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Interesting. That is why we "draw the line"
-
Forgive me, astrology should read astronomy...
-
hello nnocturne.
I think we've missed a point. Something is not defined by the noun or appelation we give it. 'Something' exists free and clear of human label and bias.
The principle of first cause is one such issue. It launched the beginning of astrology & was couched as religion, & yet it was used to launch our greatest age...the age of reason and 'cause & effect'.
That people of different bias may label it does mean it can be proven or disproven by any means yet developed.
-
hello
smoke another bong hippie
thespist 4 years ago
I am neither a hippie nor a pot-smoker. Sorry to disappoint.
nnocturne 4 years ago