Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens 05

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
29,142
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 30, 2009

The second debate between Frank Turek (author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist) and Christopher Hitchens (author of God is not Great). The question of this debate was "What Best Explains Reality: Atheism or Theism? and was recorded at The College of New Jersey.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • If they could come up with the big bang theory from just reading the bible.. then what has stopped them for two thousand years?... Its easy to make things match things up in hindsight.

  • @GabrielGroverMan Are you serious? Turek just stated facts and made blind assertions that are in now way connected. You were obviously lost in the science jargon and all you heard was " big science words, jesus is lord, more big science words"

see all

All Comments (229)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @chirectomy Wow--you are so deluded. Why don't YOU try refuting Tureks points??? YOU CANT. And who the hell says "...points, which I think should be fairly easily refuted"....What kind of intelectual laziness is this? This makes me sick. You just ASSUME it "just wasn't his best night" then go on to assume Tureks points may be "easily refuted" thus Turek is wrong. Please. Go listen to your master.

  • @Phonyender Agreed.

    

  • @SuperMrgabriel ...AS IF. ALL the "other gods" behave like fallen angels and have IDENTICLE properties and qualities as fallen angels. Don't tell me their not fallen angels. Turning a blind eye to blunt truth is not an argument nor is it some stance.

  • @SuperSam424 "God>Consciousness>Metaphysica­l senses(Study)>Sounds>Letters>W­­ords" is proof of a god ? which god?

    that proof can be proof for any other god and don't say the other gods are fallen angels proof the other gods are fallen angels

  • God>Consciousness>Metaphysical senses>Sounds>Letters>Words

    If you don't get it it's because YOU DON'T GET IT, not because it is non-sensical. I assure you this makes more sense than anything you've laid eyes on.

  • @oneildevo You and 32 other people are idiots. Congradulations. Here's proof for God:

    God>Consciousness>Metaphysical senses(Study)>Sounds>Letters>W­ords

    If you don't get it it's because YOU DON'T GET IT, not because it is non-sensical. I assure you this makes more sense than anything you've laid eyes on.

  • "There is a lot of nothingness coming our way" is nonsensical and if you can't see that you're simply deluded and seduced by his british accent.

  • Hitchens is a joke as a debater

  • @1992jamo it was his implication ,maybe just one of many ,but a dumnb one

  • @roxfoot That wasn't his argument.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more