Rubber Band Powered Flight
Loading...
99,898
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (103)
-
they are very stupids
-
mas inutil impocible jajjaaa
-
On the original design you need dihedral or winglets for stability, the landing gear could be lighter. Do some reading and try again, you can make it work!
-
These were crap.
-
65 HP? didn't know horses could fly hehe :)
-
Who thought the first plane was WAY bigger?
-
its either to heavey, or needs the prepellors to spin faster.
-
Fly outside, earling morning. Maiden flights require unrestricted airspace. Hand launch over soft grass. Adjust model as necessary.
-
You need either a stronger rubber band, a bigger tail, or launch it gently by hand. If you eliminate the stall they both look like they will fly. Very nice job.
-
put a rc motor on there then it would fly
Loading...



@Reallaty
You're retarded and clearly do not know much of anything relating to this subject. A classic 'Youtube idiot', posting and commenting where you do not belong. A proper free flight rubber powered model can achieve flight times on the order of 10mins indoors. Outdoors, they can fly out of sight.
The planes shown here are a good attempt, but appear too heavy and overbuilt to fly well, if at all.
tommyeflight89 2 years ago 13
First off, it is nice to see kids your age with interests other than video games. The plane looks awesome. I own a 1946 Aeronca Cheif myself. The initial take off attempt is a perfect example of the "yaw" that is developed from a single prop aeroplane. I believe you would of had lift off if the main wings had more angle of incedence. If you noticed with a tail dragger, when the tail comes up, the angle at which the main wings intersect the air, they are basically straight. Awesome though!
Bushflyerman 1 year ago 2