Ron Paul On Immunization Shots

How surprising, Michael trying to avoid discussion of his asinine proposals yet again by resurrecting a thread via spam.

You have not demonstrated the "failure" of a SINGLE study. Calling something a "review" does not invalidate the information and analysis contained therein. Claiming that someone has a conflict of interest without any evidence is also not invalidating.

You refuse to accept reviews and you refuse to read the individual studies. In other words, you are a lazy idiot.

Stumpy has given 26 studies to support her position, but has never read or understood any of them. I have already demonstrated that 6 of those studies do not support her, and she is so averse to reading them she refuses to pick the best 2. Once I demonstrate that her BEST 2 do not support her position, the other 24 fail automatically.

This is the real reason she will not pick 2 studies. she wants me to tie up my time reading the studies.

6 down stump, you still fear picking 2

Batty again putting words into mouths of people with real educations "it is clear the authors do not give it weight [Dr.s Wakefield's and Geiers' studies] Look Batty, 3 more people you criticize each with more education than both of us put together

Batty is simply a lying shill without the credentials he used to allude qualified him to comment. Now he's reduced to outright lying, spamming, deflection

There are MANY more studies than just from Dr Wakefield and the 2 Dr Geiers

There is only one Dr Geier. His son is not a doctor. That Geier has been disqualified a dozen times and has not given expert testimony contributing to a winning case in 20 years. Wakefield is in front of the GMC facing ethics and fraud charges.

Do post the many other studies. I am waiting. You have not posted anything to support your position yet.

Now which one of these statements is a lie?

Convenient how you left out that I said the vast majority of change is due to diagnostic change. The Davis study does not discount genetic drift as a part in change and I did not say that genetic drift played a major role.
That said, I would put money you do not know what genetic drift is.
You go ahead and keep using "liberal arts degree" as a pejorative. It only shows how someone with no degree can be jealous of learning how to read and critically analyze material.

Batty your stating that genetic drift had ANYHTING to do with autism's rise in the 90's is the most bone-headed thing you have ever posted.

Your attempts to backpedal and try to downplay it are all the more embarrassing. Hell batty I'm embarrassed for you wit hhtis latest attempt to justify the incredibly stupid remark

Stop Lying
Stop Hurting Kids

I am not attempting to backpedal anything. I stand 100% behind what I said. Note how you did not even attempt to respond to the fact that you left out the majority being diagnostic change. Note how I did not say that genetic drift accounted for the majority. Note how you attempt to deflect from your inaccuracies.

Do tell me what genetic drift is and how it has NOTHING to do with changes in allele rates for a genetic disease.

There is only one person who has done any lying here, you.

I have stated my degree numerous times on these comment boards and you know it. Or are you really that senile? I do love how you jump back to this a week later on a different SN.
Oh look, just spanked you again. Where was the part where you spanked me? Oh, that is right, there haven't been any. You saying it does not make it valid.

Batty says he hasstated his degree many times... so I'm waiting Batty... Where?

Many times should not be hard to find. I guarantee that if you had EVER told me about it I would have been blasting you about your previous posturing immediately and relentlessly

Stop Hurting Kids you lying sociopathic shill

Oh, I said "degree" when talking about Batty's education. I should have said "Liberal Arts Degree"

Sorry Batty... really, I am very sorry... lol