The Great Health Debate Daniel Vitalis Part 4

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• The
• Great
• Health
• Debate
• Daniel
• Vitalis
• Part
• 4

[Ekergaard]

I don't think the population must be reduced. Certainly with today's technology it'll be difficult to feed 9 billion people. In 2050, we will not use today's technology, we will use advanced future technology. And so far population pessimists - from Malthus to Ehrlich - have been wrong. I don't belive in Daniel fantasy that we should live like Tarzan. (Beijing's brutal population control has caused problems, a rapidly aging population and a surplus of men).

[keithallenlaw]

@Ekergaard I suppose it all comes down to how much elbow room, or lack there of you are willing to live with. Me, I like wide open spaces and not being around crowds of people.

Just my preference.

[Kawigreen]

@kegz51

People haven't been brought up conditioned to it. I(along with many people I know) have no problem seeing and handling dead animals because we've been around it for many years. A mangled, rotting animal just isn't attractive to anyone. It's not the same.

[kegz51]

2:18 we are destroying animal habitat so that we can factory farm millions of animals. If we let those go back to normal rainforest and plains, there wouldn't be enough meat produced to feed all the "carnivorous" people.

If we are designed for meat, why are slaughter houses disgusting to people? why don't we find roadkill attractive?

Get upset at the thought of smashing a watermelon? Smashing a little kittens head and eating its brains?!? These should get equal reactions if they are food 4u

[lumberjak1984]

@charlesobama oh yeah!!

[lumberjak1984]

2:45 makes so much sense.end of story