Could post a paragraph or two about what is going on here? I came by almost at random, and know I'm intrigued. Also I see that info is no longer availabe on your site.
Tell that to NASA. They lost a teathered satellite due to reducing Maxwell's original work. I feel Heavyside aided to hinder more than he helped. "As we see it".. um.. not all the time, unless a "quantum model" is superimposed. Again, modern EE does not include quantum physics, so they are limited by that reduction.
I disagree, and in my marthale7 postings I explain how to to a good home-brew measurement on the number of Joules stored in a battery. The idea being to know how many Joules in the battery(ies) at the start of the experiment, run the experiment, and then measure the energy left in the battery(ies). Measuring the battery voltage give you very little information, you have to measure the Joules.
"Between 1880 and 1887, Heaviside developed the operational calculs), a method of solving differential equations by transforming them into ordinary algebraic equations which caused a great deal of controversy when first introduced"
That's "Da Bomb" right there. It is one of the most important applications of mathematical modeling used in engineering. It is used for electric circuits, reducing them to algebraic equations. Awesome dude.
That's cool, I just read a few things about Oliver Heaviside. He really laid out a lot of important groundwork in his field. He name should have a much higher profile.
Keep in mind that the "Maxwell-Heaviside Equations" model the electromagnetic reality as we see it. Even if we can't exactly explain why and the mechanism, they do accurately reflect and can predict how all electric circuits operate.
We'll see how it goes. Regarding Bedini, if one can charge multiple batteries off of one, and then cycle(charge and discharge them at the C20 rating) them numerous times from the same battery, that is better than any meter could show.
Maxwell's "laws" were reduced from the original by Heavyside and company. So really, they are no longer Maxwell's but someone else's interpretation of them.
Could post a paragraph or two about what is going on here? I came by almost at random, and know I'm intrigued. Also I see that info is no longer availabe on your site.
zamistro 3 years ago
Huh? I agree with your disagreement. Yes, measuring the joules is the best way... ie cycling the batteries with a known resistive load.
***I sent you a private message. Did you receive it?***
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago
Tell that to NASA. They lost a teathered satellite due to reducing Maxwell's original work. I feel Heavyside aided to hinder more than he helped. "As we see it".. um.. not all the time, unless a "quantum model" is superimposed. Again, modern EE does not include quantum physics, so they are limited by that reduction.
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago
I disagree, and in my marthale7 postings I explain how to to a good home-brew measurement on the number of Joules stored in a battery. The idea being to know how many Joules in the battery(ies) at the start of the experiment, run the experiment, and then measure the energy left in the battery(ies). Measuring the battery voltage give you very little information, you have to measure the Joules.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
"Between 1880 and 1887, Heaviside developed the operational calculs), a method of solving differential equations by transforming them into ordinary algebraic equations which caused a great deal of controversy when first introduced"
That's "Da Bomb" right there. It is one of the most important applications of mathematical modeling used in engineering. It is used for electric circuits, reducing them to algebraic equations. Awesome dude.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
That's cool, I just read a few things about Oliver Heaviside. He really laid out a lot of important groundwork in his field. He name should have a much higher profile.
Keep in mind that the "Maxwell-Heaviside Equations" model the electromagnetic reality as we see it. Even if we can't exactly explain why and the mechanism, they do accurately reflect and can predict how all electric circuits operate.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
Thanks, I didn't look, but there are OTHER ways as well.
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago
We'll see how it goes. Regarding Bedini, if one can charge multiple batteries off of one, and then cycle(charge and discharge them at the C20 rating) them numerous times from the same battery, that is better than any meter could show.
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago
I have no need too as long as i prove it to myself.
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago
Maxwell's "laws" were reduced from the original by Heavyside and company. So really, they are no longer Maxwell's but someone else's interpretation of them.
Truthbeeknown 4 years ago