"To Be a Liberal" by Roy Zimmerman

words and music by Roy Zimmerman
Please like me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Roy-Zimmerman/39171898761
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/royzimmerman
Visit me at http://royzimmerman.com/

Recorded at 142 Throckmorton Theatre at "Mark Pitta and Friends."

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• liberal
• conservative
• knee
• jerk
• satire
• election

[rono243]

im leberal and i love this fucking song lol its just sterotypes dont take it seriously

[txtblockd]

Rock on, Man! LOL! That is some of the funniest satirical singing I have ever heard in my life! LOVE IT!

[MrBrucebracey]

Very enjoyable thank you

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello Final Comment. Stalin was very effective in labelling opponents, especially leftwingers, as 'right wing'. It smeared them as totally antithetical to him. The same smear tactic is used with the term today.

Regarding Nazis,no modern socialists advocate Nazism, sure. The ends of their socialism was the same as the Soviets, Maoists etc. They just used different means - spreading it via their own national group rather than internationaly, like most socialists/communists.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 3b I'm sorry I didn't know Herman Cain was a white supremacist. Or Colonel Allen West. Or Condoleesa Rice, or even Colin Powell.

And if were thinking as you read those names that they are just Uncle Toms or some such like. Well that's just racist, my friend.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 3a. I'm sorry I'm not American so I don't have the educational basis in knowledge of American Presidents others have. But to take the party that freed the slaves and politically enabled the Civil Rights movement, is somehow reversed today, when the Republicans (members, if not the establishment) are the ones speaking out against ingraining in AfroAmericans in welfare entitlement, economic slavery in all but name, is just wrong.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 2c. Again a contradiction Hitler "himself had no problem with exploitation of the masses". That is purely a left wing construct. Free market advocates and libertarians ("capitalists") exploit no masses, that is straight out Marxism there. Free markets need no one to influence, they just create products people want to buy and price them at enables enough profit after their expenses to create the next new product people want to buy.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 2b. In the 1920s, America, of which Wall Street was concerned about, had free market growth leading to unregulated average income increases of over 20% for average people (not just the already wealthy). The free market boom companies that Ford and General Electric were at the time speak of the success of free markets and their innovation.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 1b. The swathes of the German population for whole social exclusion was imposed, were not considered 'German' by the Nazis. Hence the 'National' side of national socialism. The national 'German' population enjoyed the best social welfare imaginable. If you look at the Holocaust of the Jews of Europe, it was an industrial process of taking their possessions, gold teeth etc.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 1a. I'm sorry I believe it is you that needs the education. Hitler/National Socialists didn't allow big business to flourish, like all socialists they wanted to take the economic activity generated by the free market and take it over or co-opt it for National Socialist use. Furthermore, any business that didn't fold to govt demands was taxed over 90% of their profits. In 1943 it was worse, 102% taxation for companies that weren't building the socialist ideal.

[Siegetower]

@PolandHello 1c. The proceeds of this redistribution of wealth from the Jews to the Germans are no different from redistribution of wealth proposed by contemporary leftists. The wealth of the Jewish people provided for the best social welfare system in the world at the time. German people enjoyed great health provision, education, social infrastructure. Leftwign welfare, leftwing policies. Just because you wouldn't use the same means doesn't mean the end is the same.