9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out

9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out

A new documentary film by Richard Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

This Film is about the evidence, not conspiracy theory! More than 1500 Architects & Engineers world wide have signed the AE petition for a new investigation. History changed after 9/11. It is very important to get a new real investigation for the future of our children.

PLEASE support the film makers by order your copy today at:

http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=145?osCsid=183dc...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Architects
• Engineers
• for
• 9/11
• Truth
• Richard
• Gage
• Explosive
• Evidence
• Experts
• Speak
• Out

[THOMACHI]

I really think Richard Gage did a very good job with this film.

[DailyStaley]

@ae911truthcensors You're a joke. over 1,300 Engineers and architectural experts including people involved with professional building demolition have joined the campaign for the truth. Let me guess, are they not true experts? You're STILL a clown with no good facts to go against the solid evidence we HAVE! How the NORAD failed to scramble fighters for the first time in history on 9/11? Cheney had control NORAD on 9/11 too. Time to wake up ae911truthcensors!

[pellenyberg]

And sorry for my bad typing, i'm from Sweden.

[pellenyberg]

You dont need a "specialist" to figure out what happend, you just have to look at all the videos and report from firedep, police, and people who was there. Its 100% planned demolition. I have worked as a licens welder for 22y and i know that this is BS! You can light up a steel building and let it burn for days and it dont going down. A skraper in Chicago burn for 36 hours and it didnt collaps. It was nothing left beside of steel! So what..Do you stil belive it come down becos of burning ??

[ae911truthcensors]

@irishman05050505 Yes I did research the ones on the video. Duh. Barasch said he built high-rises that were built in 1926. All the Engineers that said they built high-rises don't mention any in their Bios on their websites. Some are house builders. None built anything over 10 stories. You should do some research on people claiming they know what happened in the massacre of 3000 people no?

[ae911truthcensors]

Gage only got 12 engineers to agree with him out of 140,000 registered in America. Wow that's impressive.

Did NORAD have protocol for attacking civilian airliners? Did they monitor domestic airspace?

Maybe some evidence supporting some theory?

[feelthewyrd]

The falling twin tower pieces TRAIL huge amounts of dust. Neither the pancake/explosives theories can explain this. Far too much dust. Far too little rubble at the bottom of the sites. No explanation for buildings WTC4 & WTC6. This video & the movement is against the 'official' theory, BUT it deliberately obscures the scientific evidence for new technology & forces to destroy these buildings. LOOK AGAIN @ the dust trailing from free falling disintegrating pieces of building. Classic explosives?

[irishman05050505]

@ae911truthcensors So what you're telling me is that you've thoroughly investigated each person's background? You can discredit Gage all you want, but it's sort of hard to discredit every other person here. But if you have actual information discredited each person, we'd all love to see it.

[ae911truthcensors]

This video is a joke. Get a bunch of "experts" who know nothing about structural failure or airplane accidents to agree. Look up the experts BIOS. None have any experience with high-rise buildings or forensic fire investigation and a high school physics teacher who makes math errors (by his own admission) disproving his theory in this video. Look it up! Gage crops Danny Jowenko's interview to cut out the part where he says WTC1-2 could not have been explosives. Quit lying Gage..

[emsaju]

This is so horrific. What can we Americans do about this?