Christians: Hateful, Homophobic, Hypocritical

How any Christian can believe that senseless condemnation of the lifestyle choices of gay people can somehow be 'softened' by empty, meaningless 'compassion' for the person himself is nonsense. Separating homosexual acts from homosexual people, by professing to hate the sin but not the sinner, is BULLSHIT. It is hypocrisy of the very worst kind.

If you don't respect what the person is or does, you do not respect the person. If you hate what gay people do in the privacy of their own homes, you are a bigot and a homophobe. And if Christianity hates homosexuality, I should have no reservation in saying that I return the sentiment: I hate Christianity.

In the true spirit of Biblical teaching, we should all hate Christianity... but not the Christians. Have no respect AT ALL for their opinions, which condemn homosexuals AND homosexuality with their weasel words. Even if it IS a choice, who are Christians to say that it is wrong?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• atheist
• atheism
• Gisburne2000
• christian
• christianity
• bible
• god
• jesus
• morality
• gay
• sex
• homosexual
• prejudice
• homophobia

[jrev37]

christians not only hate gays, they hate every one outside their cult. atheist, muslims. etc.

[SamxDean4eva]

I agree with you :)

I'm an Atheist going to a Christian school (parents decision :/), and they give me so much shit for being pro-gay and not believing what they do.

Its wrong and they are to close-minded.

They hate everything/everyone that doesn't agree with them/the bible.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 You are right, I shouldent genralise, because I have met many christians and got along with them, you are one of the worst I have seen.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 Oh no, it can't be. Shit I have to spell it out to you.

Christians do not believe in evolution, correct, you are WITH science, YET medical science is based on evolutionary theories. Do you understand that? In science assumptions are tested by trying to disprove them, yet in christianity you take on flawed universal conradictary truth. Who puts assumptions above anything else?

Good boy you are using a computer, that is not tied into evolution.

[fundreamer1]

@prenticeanyonywright You confuse me with you're pathetic idea of what a Christian is.

You're logic is very flawed because you put assumptions above everything.

Why do you think that being a Christian makes one against science? I'm using a computer to communicate with you, are I?

You're original questions don't merit attention when you talk to me with no respect whatsoever.

You are just as boring as any other atheist, now go troll someone else. You are just a waste of time.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 You even made a fool out of yourself by telling me I had "flawed logic" as your very explanation of this makes no sense. You seem to have created your own set of definitions and rules that are simply wrong. On the other hand you are rather smart, you have managed to dodge all relevant questions by trying to point out flaws in them. This is similar behavior a young child may display. Infact you can't even tell why my "words are poison." anser my original questions moron.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 Um no analysing is completely independant of set goals, choosing not to believe in something is not doing nothing because you have made a conscience desision.

"Phrasal Verb:

cop out

To avoid fulfilling a commitment or responsibility." My point is that if science had acted "responsibly" you would be praying cancer better and using biblical remedies, Whilst also mentioning that evolution works when applied to real life (your a christian so sorry you ARE against science)

[fundreamer1]

@prenticeanyonywright Analysing with only one goal in mind, is not an open mind.

Choice is done by doing nothing, it is still a choice, and you are responsible for yours.

Medication is made by science, so what?

I never said I was against science.

You are still using flawed logic here.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 No if I don't believe in god I am not making a concious decision to go to hell, If one cannot decide it is by definition not a choice. About the whole science bit, you better stop taking medication based on genetics and evolution then(all medicine) and just pray yourself better,. Also analysing by its very nature shows I do have an open mind. Problem?

[fundreamer1]

@prenticeanyonywright That statement shows that you would not, and do not have an open mind.

If you want someone to talk scientifically with, I'm not the best choice, that is a cop out anyway.

And no, God doesn't make you choose to live with sin and suffer the consequences that comes with it.

You're logic in that statement is flawed.

[prenticeanyonywright]

@fundreamer1 Try me, I will watch it and explain in as much detail as possible why it doesent prove god is real. Explain to me scientifically what an open mind is? Also so people choose to go to hell, yet I don't think it is real so go there by default. So god created everything and is all powerful so made the devil and lets people who have sinned burn for ALL eternity. No I think if god is real he chooses. God punishes people for thinking logically? wow.