Uddin Claims £100,000 for "Empty Home"

Is this a case of BBC NEWS CENSORSHIP? On Sunday 3rd May 2009 the major British newspapers reported that Baroness Uddin had claimed £100,000 on parliamentary expenses for a home in which she was not living. Perhaps a bigger story even than this was the fact that it was three days before the BBC News (television and website) said a word about it. Was this because a a woman, a Muslim and a member of a minority group, the Baroness had three times the immunity of most? Was the BBC protecting its license fee application or did they not broadcast in order not to inflame the situation? Worse still, could they have been persuaded not to broadcast by some outside influence?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Baroness Uddin
• Snouts in the Trough
• Parliamentary Expenses

[iBeep2009]

Should be in jail.

[iBeep2009]

Theiving Bitch! Now owns 3 houses in London, and claims she cant pay back the £125K!! So is paid £300 a day in expenses at House of Lords on her return to politics - and can't be sacked! When she was starting her career as a sponger off the backs of the workers, she claimed she was a communist, and used addresses in Hackney to hold her meetings in, yet never lived in the area! Just a thieving cow!

[JollyRodders]

This woman is corrupt...It's just that she and her equally corrupt friends have found a nice little loop hole to wriggle through. Now she can claim that she is really just a poor victim.

That and the way they are trying to bankrupt the BNP just before an election surely means that even those that don't really support the BNP may just vote for it out of protest at the corrupt political establishment that we have in this country. What a sorry state of affairs.

[KEYOTWISTEDJOKER]

Uddin is making Nick Griffen look like a nice man.

[pizzabeermusic]

This confirms what a lot of people already suspect.  The BBC is biased.

[faro0485]

Bizare just like how the BBC promoted Khomeini through Iran.