The Synoptic problem

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,591
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 28, 2009

A brief consideration of why Matthew, Mark and Luke's gospels are not identical in their account of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus. Written with Kavanagh College students in mind.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Did Luke and Matthew refer to the Romans destroying the temple, unlike in Mark? I have a Religious exam on Tuesday and i wanted to know if it was relevant to score me some extra marks? thanks

  • Apologist117,

    You have a narrow vision and discussing these theories does not lead to Atheism. You sighted Dostoyevsky because you believe his analogy which is flawed. I would not be surprised if Christology falls under your definition of heresy too. Being formally educated in the Bible has enriched my understanding and actually brought me closer in my relationship with Yahweh. As your name suggests, perhaps you should apologize to KavanaghInfo. KavanaghInfo, please keep up the good work!

  • This, of course, is the dilemma of dealing with texts that are nearly 2000 years old and are packed with content that is cultural, geographical, historiacal and spiritual. I do agree that "we can trust the gospels'. Thank you for your comment.

  • Loading comment...
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more