Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Expected Consequence of "Little Mommy, Gotta Go" dolls? (AKA "Baby NOT Alive")

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
693 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 10, 2010

Why allowing a 4 year old to baby-sit is not such a great idea...

All sympathies to the young 4 year old who will no doubt feel guilt over this as she gets older, even though it's pretty clear the Mom bears the full burden for being dumb enough to expect a 4 y.o. to be able to baby-sit an 11-month old!

I can't help but wonder if young kids being encouraged to provide care to babies (feeding, giving bathes, etc) in the name of selling dolls doesn't play a role here.... I say a class-action lawsuit on behalf of toddlers against Mattel is in order! Search for "Baby Alive Bath" for further proof....

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to "Little Mommy, Gotta Go" doll, by Mattel
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more