Eyewitness Evidence - 4 of 4 (Hank Hanegraaff)

This is part of a series by Hank Hanegraaff on 4 evidences for the Resurrection (M-A-P-S).

Visit www.leestrobel.com for hundreds of more FREE excellent Christian videos.

Todd Tyszka
www.toddtyszka.com



lee strobel hank hanegraaff apologist apologetic apologetics resurrection evidence Bible Christ Jesus Christian atheist agnostic skeptic proof proves eyewitness eyewitnesses New NT Testament Gospel Gospels evidences witness witnesses

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• lee
• strobel
• hank
• hanegraaff
• apologist
• apologetic
• apologetics
• resurrection
• evidence
• Bible
• Christ
• Jesus
• Christian
• atheist
• agnostic
• skeptic
• proof
• proves
• eyewitness
• eyewitnesses
• New
• NT
• Testament
• Gospel
• Gospels
• evidences
• witness
• witnesses

[idspud52]

I did not think there was any orginal manuscrits around. So we dont really know what was taken away from or added to what the original apostiles wrote, do we

[toddtyszka]

He never said (or implied) that the manuscripts we have were the originals. They are clearly copies from an original because they all say the same thing, beside insignificant and minor typos.

[idspud52]

All Im sayin is there is lots of missing stuff and contradictions. Example acts 9:7

acts 22:9. Letter of Paul mentioned but not found. In general man mucking the word of God for two thousand years

[toddtyszka]

That's not a contradiction! First of all, it was written in GREEK, not English. The Greek "Akouo," like our word "hear," has TWO distinct meanings, to perceive sound, and to understand. As far as "standing," that word also means to be fixed/rooted to a spot which would make complete sense. Or they could have "fell to the earth" but afterward rose and "stood" upon their feet. No contradiction at all!

[idspud52]

Sorry about being so slow at getting back with you. In acts 9:7 the contradiction comes in hearing a voice not seeing a man?

22:9 heard not the voice. Did they or didnt they?

Mathew and Luke cant decide agree on how judas died. Mat 27:5 hanged

Acts 1:18 fell down and disebowled.

Still goes to the argument that the Bible as we have it today is not complete. Man has mucked it up over time. Agree or disagree?

[toddtyszka]

I said nothing about seeing the man. They heard, yet didn't understand (the same word is used, reread my comment). The original Greek makes complete sense, read the NIV for a comparative English translation.

Judas' death, well it's believed that they each highlighted a different aspect of his death. Judas hung himself overhanging the valley of Hinnom, & the limb or rope gave way, & he fell. The terrain lends support to this theory, & his bowels could have burst on the sharp jagged rocks there.

[jemerson85]

jesus didn't call anyone a "loser" but he did call some individuals "snakes" and "pigs".

[Ricardius1710]

@toddtyszka Minoir typos? The gospels have more discrepancies than just typos. How about when Jesus was crucified, before or after passover? Who went to the empty tomb first, the women or Peter? On and On. The gospels are not historically accurate.

[ivanisavich]

Hanegraaff and Strobel in the same room? Add Moe or Curly and you've got the Three Stooges.

[zappo1355]

Finally, the story is just one big implausible mess. Imagine the entire Roman Empire uprooting for the week to go the home of their ancestors from a THOUSAND YEARS before??! What exactly is the point of ANY census anyway?? To find out where YOU live, and know where to come knocking for money. Oh, and then no other ancient writer even bothering to mention this Exodus of millions in passing. COME ON HANK!!

[zappo1355]

Sorry, can't let you go appealing to "dr. Luke" for historical accuracy, and ignore his historical blunders. There was no Census under Quirinius (the one in 6CE didn't affect Galileans) when Luke says there was in appx 4BCE. He wasn't the governor of Syria when Herod the Great was ruling--and we know who was. Further, during Herod the Great's reign, Judea was a satellite client states; the Roman's wouldn't have collected taxes.

[GrendelNin]

@TheSavedSinner

1) The "Big Bang" is cosmology and has NOTHING to do with evolution.

2) No scientist has ever claimed life, or anything else for that matter, came "from nothing".

[mikrobluess]

How typical... just remove comments with questions that you don't want answered...lmao

that just confirms my belief in christian institutions brainwashing people for their own benifit... well done!

[wachnathan]

@TheSavedSinner Wow what a myth god you Christians are nutz! you and your double standards love can be good or evil did you know that. love is obsession over somthing it doesn't mean i will protect you and gaurd life because i asure you your god doesn't Christians die just like everone else.

[wachnathan]

@TheSavedSinner Your bases of belief is this to be selfless is anti life anti human nature and the core of your belief is a mythical being that doesn't even have power to manifest its self Christians stopped the progress of technology and science in Rome and thus caused its distruction and not to mention suppressed females to make them feel be littled. You belief is a lie covered up with basic truth with the building blocks of selfish supressive intentions to control evereone.