NONDISCLOSURE: The Trailer

Take action: http://mm4a.org/WSJdisclose

The Wall Street Journal has been publishing op-eds from 10 Romney Campaign advisers without disclosing the writers' campaign role.

Editors from the nations top papers have criticized the WSJ's lack of disclosure, calling it "inexcusable" a nd "shameless." Find out what else they said here: http://mm4a.org/SoaRfw

Sign the letter to WSJ Editorial Page Editor Paul Gigot, asking the WSJ to stop hiding campaign roles of its writers.

Take action: http://mm4a.org/WSJdisclose

----
Voice-Over by D.C. Douglas

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[Vespasian76]

From what you've heard MSNBC is a close second? Heard where? On Fox? MSNBC is definitely liberal, except for Joe Scarborough, but they are much more accurate than Fox, and when they make errors, they correct them...on air. When Fox makes and egregious error and is caught, they often deny having said what they said.

[culinaryhightv]

Then the articles are just campaign ads disguised as journalism. An overt attempt to manipulate the readers who assume they are reading facts. Twisted, devious and just what I'd expect from the 'scared _ _ _ _less we might lose this one' gang. Thx for the heads-up MM!

[kagemaru397]

S.E.Cupp from The Cycle is also conservative.

[luver209]

Everything Murdoch touches turns to shit

[armadilloze]

If everything Faux News says is true, go to Walgreens for your pap smears and breast exams and see what they say. Easy fact checking.

[qualityrkc]

I would argue that there are no mainstream publications that have journalism ethics. You should listen to some of Noam Chomskys lectures about collusion between the media and the government. He gives some really amazing examples of whitewashing in supposedly credible publications like the New York Times. My point is that only going after fox will lead the uneducated to beleive that other publications have more integrity which they do not.

[solerso68]

its not about 'admitting bias"...its about using the confidence people have in the (assumed) judgement and proffesional impartiality of an ostensibly, joutrnalistic name the the Wa Po. Such an organization as WaPo once earned and deserved such a reputation for standards of journalism ethics. Even though the have long since sold that reputation to corporate money, many (otherwise serious) people still believe in the papers standards . Why do we need it explained why wrong is wrong?

[qualityrkc]

But what does it matter if they admit bias or not. A news organization should not have strong bias to begin with! The lies Fox news promote are no more offensive than that of CNN or MSNBC. Have you ever watched the ed schultz show? He is the democrat version of Hannity. Regardless, all cable news stations support the status quo and avoid news stories which would make members of both parties angry with their government like the plague. They only report partisan news. They are all complicit.

[route99]

"in a world where people turn to newspapers for information..."

Okay, so it's not Earth...where are they talking about?

[captdot]

Do your own homework!