The Cultural Revolution, launched by Mao Zedong, was a huge disaster in the contemporary history of China. It drove the whole country to the edge of ruin. And Tibet also suffered serious damage. Th...
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
There were two temples in Shanghai that I am referring to. One in the No, very popular. When it came under attack during Cultural revolution, by the people, the gov sent out forces to protect it.
The second temple, that had a small pagoda, in the Sothern outskirts of Shanghai was destroyed by angry people who felt they had been horribly exploited by the temple.
If you lived in Shanghai, or if you visited these temples, you could ask about what happened to them.
I believe the Cultural revolution was a disaster. Mao, and his followers had no way to direct the focus of the mobs. Their "enemies" survived, and the "revolution" was lost. But during the Cultural Revolution, millions of "Little Red Guards' committed horrible crimes against their neighbors, and all was done with out any justice, there was no rule of law.
The answer to your question is not a simple yes or no. But when we set loose "lynch mobs" or incite riots, we should know violence follows.
The names of the temples are the Jade Budda Temple, which was protected, and the Lonhhau Temple that was destroyed. Longhua was the site of internments of chinese people, by the Japanese, Chiang Kai Sheck, and the local people hated it. The Cultural revolution provided cover for the destruction of this temple.
Acording to Buddhist ethics. a govennment had a duty to keep order. Mao was wrong to unleash the CR, but the Cinese Gov was right in bringing order to Tiananmen.
Two things affected Mao's view of Buddhism in China. 1, his mother was Buddhist, so he knew how some Chinese looked down on Buddhists. 2, on the Long March, Mao saw a young girl, age 16, "who was so poor she had no pants." Mao vowed that when they succeeded in wresting China from the control of the Impreialists, the drug war lords, and the Green Gang, that Sichuan would be the first place he would bring a better life to. History shows that he kept his promise to the people of Sichuan.
Have you read the Chinese government documents, discussion and debate on this issue? Clearly, Mao disagreed with the Soviet trained communists. Buddhism was surpressed, during the Mao years, but is that because Mao hated Buddhism?
Also, and we face this problem today, many people blame Islam for the "extreemist" terrorism going on now. If the US used religeous figures to cause trouble in China, then when troublemakers were aprehended, the US claimes religeous persecution. It's a strategy.
I doubt this book should be used as a neutral, unbiased, accurate history of what happened to Buddhism under Mao, much less historically in China.
Have you read much 'fiction" to see how ordinary people in China viewed Buddhism?
Let me say this again, Soviet style communism was opposed to absolutely religeon. Mao was not. There had always been a struggle between Mao and the Soviet trained communists.
Again, Mao's mother was a Buddhist, and he did his best to defend it.
Why do you think my comments distort history? I have carefully reviewed many official reports od destruction all over China, including Tibet at that time. They all agree that is what happened. Did you know that Mao's mother was a Buddhist, and that is why he opposed democratization in Lahsa, and supported the Dalai Lama and autonomy? He was finally overruled by the Politiboro, when the CIA trained and armed Tibetan contra scheme was revealed.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The second temple, that had a small pagoda, in the Sothern outskirts of Shanghai was destroyed by angry people who felt they had been horribly exploited by the temple.
If you lived in Shanghai, or if you visited these temples, you could ask about what happened to them.
The answer to your question is not a simple yes or no. But when we set loose "lynch mobs" or incite riots, we should know violence follows.
Acording to Buddhist ethics. a govennment had a duty to keep order. Mao was wrong to unleash the CR, but the Cinese Gov was right in bringing order to Tiananmen.
Mob rule is unjust.
Also, and we face this problem today, many people blame Islam for the "extreemist" terrorism going on now. If the US used religeous figures to cause trouble in China, then when troublemakers were aprehended, the US claimes religeous persecution. It's a strategy.
Have you read much 'fiction" to see how ordinary people in China viewed Buddhism?
Let me say this again, Soviet style communism was opposed to absolutely religeon. Mao was not. There had always been a struggle between Mao and the Soviet trained communists.
Again, Mao's mother was a Buddhist, and he did his best to defend it.
I believe there is no need to lie about this.
=> I was talking about the Cultural Revolution. Not about the policy on Tibet.