Sachin Tendulkar vs Don Bradman
Top Comments
All Comments (141)
-
@KUSHAJ9 Bradmans strike rate was more than 60 which is high even in this era.He is also said to be a good feilder.There is no reason to believe that he wouldnt have been good in shorter games.And todays technology ,flat tracks would have helped him a lot in scoring quick.And there is no reason to belive that he wouldnt score runs against todays great bowlers
-
True but 99 in the 30's!
-
WTF is with you Indian fans, you are clearly the most deluded sporting fans on the planet. It's arguable whether Sachin is better than other greats like Sobers, Richards, Lara etc. Lara's exploits with the willow are extraordinary, Sobers and Richards averaged 60 for most of their careers before their inevitable twilight slump. Those two would have averaged 60 today, easily.
To say Tendulkar is the GOAT is the height of ignorance and is sadly reflective of the intellect of the average Indian.
i keep on reading that the quality of bowling was bad back when bradman played when cricket started as mainly a bowling game bradman averages 99 the next is pollock at 60 if the bowling was bad then another person would have averaged somewhere near bradman but no one does i rate tendulkar at about the same as kallis both greats but not as great as bradman
benjpaine300 9 months ago 13
If you are the opposition who would you rather see walking out to bat- a guy averaging 56 or a guy averaging 99? Pretty obvious answer. Doesn't matter how long the 57 batsman has been playing, 57 is 57. 57 aint 99. It will never be. 57 is Sobers, Kallis, Sachin. 99 is ONE MAN. BRADMAN.
robelinda2 6 months ago 9