Introduction to Category Theory 1: Course Overview
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Published on Jul 3, 2012
Brief history of category theory, followed by a discussion of what it is and how it is meant to be used. Discussed syllabus and format.
Now that I've figured out SketchBookExpress and Camtasia, future lectures will hopefully be less choppy and more punctual.
P.S. I forgot to mention in the video that my history of category theory is mostly fabricated. For a real/better timeline, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline...
This is a University of Reddit course. The course page may be found at http://ureddit.com/class/36451/, and the official discussion site at http://www.reddit.com/r/URIntroCatego....
-
Category
-
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
1:00:24
Roger Penrose on Twistors and Quantum Non-Localityby TVOFeatured
32,454
-
TheCatsters
78 videos2K
-
39:26
Introduction to Category Theory 2: Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations (UPDATED)by error792
3,338 views
-
3:20
Berkeley Ring Theorist Solves 48 ÷ 2(9+3)by thirtysix
49,436 views
-
1:45
Category Theory - Dr Richard Garner - Macquarie Universityby MacquarieUniversity
2,316 views
-
1:32:22
Dominic Verity on Category Theory (Part 2)by GoogleFOSSSydney
3,812 views
-
22:21
Group theory: Free groupsby litsky
1,677 views
-
14:29
Sites and Sheaves Mainline 1by mimrir
733 views
-
11:06
fields-groups-ringsby Janet Bowers
4,824 views
-
53:42
Saylor.org MA231: Harvard University's "Rings 1"by saylorfoundation
5,856 views
-
28:51
Introduction to Higher Mathematics - Lecture 17: Rings and Fieldsby Bill Shillito
537 views
-
9:49
gemvision matrix smart flow ring m pekinby mehmet pekin
30,390 views
-
5:26
Definition of a Sheafby mimrir
281 views
-
34:01
20080414, math 480: lecture8 -- groups, rings, and fieldsby William Stein
2,315 views
-
5:11
Mathematik für Informatik Studenten 42 - Algebraische Grundstrukturen : Ringeby Brotcrunsher
1,490 views
-
20:47
RNT1.4. Ideals and Quotient Ringsby MathDoctorBob
1,865 views
-
53:04
Introduction to Category Theory 3: Basic Constructions and Ideasby error792
1,672 views
-
16:18
RNT1.1. Definition of Ringby MathDoctorBob
2,660 views
-
37:50
Faster jQuery With Category Theory by John Benderby Confreaks
1,283 views
-
23:44
Introduction to Category Theory: Monoidsby error792
2,609 views
-
9:05
Monads 1by TheCatsters
47,968 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Uploader Comments (error792)
eigenlambda 9 months ago
video (17:50) says that the tensor product of two modules over the reals are the coproduct, wikipedia says the coproduct is the direct sum
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
error792 9 months ago
17:50 says that the tensor product of two *algebras* is the coproduct
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
XetXetable 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Since I brought up the subject of unprofessionalism, I think I should highlight the history part of the video. You yourself acknowledge that the history was bogus, but you kept that part in anyway. You can use YouTube to edit out the clip so people don't waste their time, or better yet, redo that section with a more accurate history.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
error792 9 months ago
I'm not trying to teach math history. The history section was just there to see the evolution of category theory in different directions (algebraic, logical, geometric, etc.), so I cherry-picked certain highlights; whether it's truthful isn't the point. The "mostly fabricated" comment is just my sense of humour, despite being made up off the top of my head it's pretty close to the truth.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
XetXetable 9 months ago
You also stated that set theory is "wrapped up in annoying formalism", implying that category theory is not. This is false, considering category theory is ENTIRELY formalism (just like a lot of other subjects). Also, the formalism in set theory isn't annoying to most. Your own personal problems with working in a field you aren't even teaching shouldn't carry over to a lecture, it's just unprofessional and colors a student’s opinion in a way that will disbenefit them.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
error792 9 months ago
I think the formalism of set theory is no longer very relevant to most mathematicians. I've never explicitly gone through the rigorous construction of addition or cardinal numbers (though I have a good idea of how to do so), and like most mathematicians I'll never need to.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
error792 9 months ago
As for unprofessionalism... this isn't a formal university course; even if it were, it's pretty common for profs to say that set theory and general topology are dead, or to make fun of other fields of mathematics. I just chill out and ramble about math while having fun with colors. Have you seen the later videos? lol
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Top Comments
SonOfNye 10 months ago
Please do not let this become a project that never gets finished. Thank you.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (37)
aneeley 2 days ago
You basically just cursed him.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
XetXetable 1 month ago
What?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mphello 1 month ago
12m6s You perfectly described my exaggerated hopes that if I could just finally understand category theory, all of life's mathematical (and non-math) problems will be solved instantly. Well, to be fair to myself, when I read all the glowing hype about the importance and power of the great works of Grothendieck, et al etc, since I'm not skilled enough to judge it, I feel I have to go along with it.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mphello 1 month ago
Siiigh.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
filter80808 2 months ago
Very informative and at times hilarious video. Thanks so much!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
navidsonpuzzle 2 months ago
Great video that very much appeals to my way of understanding things and communicating - thanks, error792! I think it's quite surprising, and unfortunate for others, that you're new to teaching.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LadislauFernandes 3 months ago
You stop posting!!! That is a crime against mathematics! Please post...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Evi1M4chine 4 months ago
Don’t listen to those Haskell tutorials, that say monads are hard, and/or use stupid analogies (all of them!). They are just really shitty at explaining it themselves, because they block their own mind with thinking it *must* be that hard, for everyone to parrot that around. And they cause you to fall into that same irrational mindset.
Only look at Haskell’s class definition for monads. Seriously! You will understand it much faster without those confusing tutorials!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Pavlo Ferrum 4 months ago
muchas gracias
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
madjestic 6 months ago
Loved the video!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube