An Objectivist on a Life Boat

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,511
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 27, 2008

Does ethics apply in emergency or "life boat" scenarios? In such situations, should one resort to cannibalism in order to survive?

NOTE: a transcription of this video is now available on my blog at:

http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/08/27/an-objectivist-on-a-life-boat/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 26 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (148)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SaveTheWheat Agreed. Those scientists are informed by bad philosophy, or non-philosophy. People today fail to comprehend that philosophy precedes/informs science, and everything else.

  • @SaveTheWheat Ayn Dumb Cunt Rand.

  • If a tree falls in an empty forest, it still makes a sound, bitches. The electron is there whether you are looking at it or not. What goes up must come down. Time to tear down all the stupid shit made up by scientists who live within a fragile god complex.

  • @neobudda1

    Scared?

  • @dsmelsergmailcom

    What dumb cunt?

  • How is eating the other guy irrational? The objective is to remain alive or relieve one's hunger, unless eating the other guy doesn't accomplish this objective I don't see how this would be irrational. If the hope is to drift unto land, eating something might just buy you enough time to still be alive when you drift unto land.That sounds rational to me.

  • This is ridiculous. I can't stomach anymore. Your understanding of subjectivism is absurd. Is there something in the kool-aid at Objectivist meetings that prevents every one of you from grasping any argument that didn't get shat out by that dumb cunt? It's really breathtaking how perfunctory the thinking of people who claim to idolize reason really is once you push past their sophistry.

  • Wow. You just completely dodged the question. "Cannibalism is short sighted." That's a fun game. Require the opposition to modify the hypothetical over and over (in this case by saying that eating the other person will allow the eater to survive until help arrives) until you get to the case that you always knew they were interested in in the first goddamn place: the place where the rubber meets the road and a decision has to be made between taking the other person's life or giving up yours.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more