Newton's Three Laws of Motion & WTC7

A simple analysis of the 3 laws of motion in regard to the collapse of WTC7 on September the 11th 2001.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• BBC5
• conspiracy
• files
• BBC
• truth
• j911ob
• bristol

[JCeiver612]

maybe for your sake you should relize were talking about a building untouched by "muslim extremists" and watch this videoagain or go back to school to understand the big words like "reaction" or "Column". because youve been dumbed down to dismiss even Newtons law when im sure you were taught about it more than once in science class. But because the government says so than you should dismiss the law. Hey why not dismiss gravity while your at it?

[32GaugeSlug]

How can you call something so obviously right, retarded -- unless you're actually a retard yourself.

[mooners40]

@diskpanic the east penthouse collapsing is indicative of the core columns being taken out prior to the final demolition - and when the roof-line drops at free-fall acceleration for 8 storeys 105 feet (which means as if thru air? ) with no force other than gravity acting on it , then this is clear evidence of a controlled demolition, because NOTHING CAN FALL THRU AIR AT THE ACCELERATION OF GRAVITY , WITHOUT THE STRUCTURE BEING TAKEN AWAY -The laws of physics can't be broken just for 1 day

[banjo234]

Yes, the 'inside job' charge can be argued one way or the other....but the argument for controlled demolition is proveably true and the 'argument' against it is, like 'diskpanic's' comment below, lying bullshit.

So many shitbags out there happy to back up the murdering shadow government bastards (who have been backed up by all western Zionist 'elected' governments) who carried out this satanic crime. Most supposedly decent politicians are just to cowardly to speak up about it.

[diskpanic]

@SciMethod

So, when I take a dump into a toilet, the fact that my turd drops into the water at Free Fall acceleration is proof that the United States government planted explosives in my ass?

[SciMethod]

Since only controlled demolitions have been observed falling at the rate of free fall acceleration, this observation is reason to question what NIST claims. That only controlled demolitions are so symmetrical is yet another reason. That NIST has provided no substantiation for their "virtual proof" simulation (no input data) is reason enough to question their conclusions. That NIST used logical fallacies to rule out the possibility of thermite is another reason not to trust their work.)

[diskpanic]

@SciMethod

So an object fell at Free Fall after it had begun global structural collapse? And you are surprised? Keep chasing your windmills, Don Quixote.

[SciMethod]

Sorry, the issue is of the rate of freefall acceleration. The issue of the penthouse has nothing to do with how quickly the edge of the building accelerates downwards. NIST itself acknowledges that WTC7 falls at the rate of freefall acceleration for 2.5 seconds. Keep looking at it. Look for David Chandler's videos (Youtube user: ae911truth)

[movieklump]

Was 9/11 was an inside job or not? Well, that can be argued one way or the other.

What can't be argued is that people can come to your door , take you away and imprison, even torture, you for no reason at all. And you have no access to the courts, family and friends and habeas corpus.

No matter what side you take both sides of the argument must agree that this is somewhat unacceptable even frightening.

Too much power for the government.

This is the first step on the road to fascism.

[fcktheirsystem]

It seems amateurish and non scientific because it is...simple really the only real evidence is the videos that we have been shown and well they speak for themselves