Expanding earth my ass
Loading...
Uploaded by potholer54 on Nov 3, 2010
Why are so many people willing to believe a nutty 19th century idea over 50 years of solid and growing evidence for plate tectonics? Because scientists are always conspiring to keep the truth from us, of course.
SOURCES:
"Conspiracy of Science -- Earth is expanding"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ
James Maxlow website at:
http://www.jamesmaxlow.com/main/
Maxlow video "Yes! The Earth is expanding"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f6hcGJbjL0
Joe's channel is at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/5mrjoe
Joe's balloon-blowing video is at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/5mrjoe#p/u/6/f_UQnZQTKPg
The electric car, I am told, is an Atom. The video is at
Electric car vs Ferrari on LaVolan channel at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqqtJpfZElQ
For an understanding of plate tectonics, just check out any geology textbook. There are many lines of evidence to the theory, so try googling the following:
Sea floor spreading
Magnetic stripes
Oceanic ridges
Mountain uplift
Altimetry
Subduction
Make sure the websites are reputable, preferably from known academic institutions. For a more detailed look at the evidence, research hundreds of papers that have been written since the 1950s. Here are a few to get you started:
Lithosphere plate-continental margin tectonics and the evolution of the Appalachian orogen
JM BIRD... - Bulletin of the Geological Society ..., 1970
United plates of America, the birth of a craton: Early Proterozoic assembly and growth of Laurentia
PF Hoffman - Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1988
Change of tectono-stratigraphic regime in the Australian plate during the 99 Ma (mid-Cretaceous) and 43 Ma (mid-Eocene) swerves of the Pacific
-- JJ Veevers - Geology, 2000 - geology
Plate tectonics and the Himalayas
CMA Powell... - Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1973
Sequence stratigraphy and plate tectonic significance of the Transvaal succession of southern Africa and its equivalent in Western Australia
ES Cheney - Precambrian Research, 1996
- 2,948 likes, 190 dislikes
-
- 5:30
Atheist now accepts Intelligent Designby potholer54166,635 views
- 1:09
Amazing sight in south Pacificby rampman01343,511 views
- 14:43
Atheist's worst nightmare!NASA confirms Quran description to BLACK HOLES!OPEN CHALLENGE TO ATHEISTSby TheAtheistsNightmare362,390 views
- 0:12
New USAby swedenman80389,526 views
- 10:27
How to confuse a creationist - 1by potholer54109,602 views
- 7:37
Steps to keep your child a creationistby suvarenee54,200 views
- 1:32
Kent Hovind Vs A Real Scientistby ZuluFightrunner73,057 views
- 3:15
NASA REVEALS REAL SIZE OF THE EARTH IS BIGGER than first thoughtby TheNASAchannel162,706 views
- 0:16
Hardest Question in The worldby paulinegirl135791,040,034 views
- 10:30
The Creationists' Nightmareby AuntieDiluvian33,643 views
- 9:09
David Icke - The TRUTH about the MOONby LivingFreeAndWealthy235,323 views
- 2:08
NASA discovers New planet behind the moonby TheNASAchannel701,663 views
- 7:37
Free energy in minutes step by stepby kojsza2,912,444 views
- 2:10
How Much More Proof Do You Need - The sun Is Setting in the Wrong Place!by TerriInBC214,377 views
- 0:48
Atheism Destroyed in Under 50 secondsby TheDemonicSoulOne489,125 views
- 3:12
Future Europe Map LEAKED by FBIby Slavko961234332,385 views
- 1:09
Cop Asks atheist for Proofby 1GodOnlyOne36,938 views
- 3:58
The craziest claim by a creationist - EVERby dprjones91,695 views
- 4:33
Fox fails at discrediting atheism.by Scanini130,587 views
@Erakivnor The fact that you think that there is no known mechanism, does not mean that you can just ignore blatant evidence that can only be explained by expansion and growth.
THERE IS NO KNOWN MECHANISM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF GRAVITY.
Get that into your cranium and try to comprehend the consequences.
MrAjjdonnelly 6 minutes ago
@nealadamsdotcom can you explain me from where the melt you are talking about comes from? "Earth has a molten undercrust in which ancient Basalt from the Mantle is melted and its clock reset. " please tell me the details of this cycle.
Erakivnor 32 minutes ago
@MrAjjdonnelly And just to let you know I am full of doubts about plate Tectonics, which has many obscure parts (like plumes, subduction reservoirs timescales, obduction, subduction initiation, crustal weakness, geologic record and so on)...but the Expandig Earth theory has too many evidences agaist and cannot provide a reliable mechanism by the known physics.
Erakivnor 36 minutes ago
@MrAjjdonnelly (sorry I'm late in replying) you have to take in account from which gas you create a plasma, it influences its density and temperature (needed to confine it). You have to get a plasma which fits the inertia and magnetic field observation. But just remember that temperature is not a free parameter. You have to get a plasma with 9.000-12.000 kg/m (convert the matter you like into electron desity if you want). Clearly you can't have ten to the 5 or more degrees...
Erakivnor 39 minutes ago
It never ceases to amaze me that people who doubt this theory don't seem to have any concept of scientific investigation.
Their general contention and assumption is - The largest group of scientist cannot be wrong.
Regardless of facts.
This runs contrary to any investigation of the history of science. The largest groups of scientists are always the slowest to accept new paradigms.
Change always comes from small groups, of piratically minded empiricists.
MrAjjdonnelly 1 hour ago
@potholer54
if youre willing to fund the research, im more than willing to accompany you in either demonstrating the plausability or not.
btw, einstien was wrong. something can travel faster than light. it took someone to question and then test it. its funny how indoctrination works.
as a final note, id ike to quote a very wise person: "those who dont learn from the past, are bound to repeat it."
johnnytheprick 4 hours ago