Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Taking Up Where Jackson Pollock Left Off

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
17,830
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 6, 2007

Frank Brown thinks the painting claimed by Teri Horton to be by Jackson Pollock may be one of his own

  • likes, 20 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (fineartregistry)

  • '...I'm sure he hadn't really reached his ultimate statement.......so.......errrr­...."

    So this guy thinks he can 'do' the ultimate statement. How the hell does he know what Pollock was going to do? Pollock began to go in different directions before he died so all this guy is doing is 'carrying on' (imitating) Pollocks most popular and acclaimed period.

    The whole thing is utterly ridiculous, how does this guy sleep at night!!!!?

  • Why don't you upload a video of your artwork? I'd love to see what you can do.

  • Jackson Pollock FINGERPRINT IS ON THE BACK OF THIS painting

  • I wonder how you would know? Especially as there are no known exemplars of Pollock's fingerprints. The whole subject of Biro's so-called forensic examination is being looked into by some real experts. Stay tuned.

  • THANK ABOUT IT, YOUR IN A ROOM THROWING PAINT AROUND AND IT GETS EVERYWHERE PAINT CANS HANDS FINGERS. GO IN A PAINT BOOTH AT A BODY SHOP AND LOOK FOR PRINTS ON THE PAINT GUN FLOOR CANS . A PRINT WAS FOUND IN POLLOCKS STUDIO ON A PAINT CAN AND ON A KNOWN PALLOCK . THIS PRINT WAS ALSO FOUND ON Teri Horton's PAINTING SHE WAS ALSO OfferED 9 MILLION FOR IT SHE DID NOT SELL

  • Keep your eyes open for the report on this.

    As for the $9 million, have you seen the offer in writing? Do you think she would turn down $9 million if it was a firm offer? Come on!

Top Comments

  • this guy is not continuing where pollock left off. there is no emotion or meaning behind what he is doing. there is nothing raw about this.

  • This guy does not understand art because the abstract art from Pollock is only Pollock's. I believe is strange for anybody else to perceived, what Pollock's humanity and essence was. No one else should take from where Pollock left off, or any other artist for that matter because no one else perceives visual forms as another person or artist would. in this case I affirm that everyone is unique and there is (was) only one Jackson Pollock.

see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @deznuts1980 OH WOW i guess if it's in a known Pallock, then it's ok

  • If by "carrying on" you mean perpetuating a fraud, then, yes, that is what you are doing.

  • One of the most common comments made about Teri's Pollock is that it's not like Pollock painted. But close-up photos have shown that Teri's painting is very much like the true Pollock style. Pollock did make globs of paint. Some of these globs were so thick the museums had to draw the wet paint out with hypodermic needles and fill the empty spaces with foam. And then there's the matter of the fingerprint. I can't judge Mr. Brown's real motivation for doing these but I wonder.

  • "Could be" yours? What artist doesn't know his own work? You're a supercilious cunt.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more