FJM MISANDRY NEWSWATCH #3: No Batman, Just Robin... Female Child Pornographer
Uploader Comments (FinalJusticeMovement)
Top Comments
-
She'll probably get off via the pussy pass like Casey Anthony did.
-
No matter how well I state the fact that the pedophile knows no gender, people remain in denial.
Its videos like these I show to those in a cultural coma.
All Comments (44)
-
I just want to see the video
-
if it were a male as victimer it would be a death sentence. but its a women, nothing will happen to her. After all, ask a Family"?" court, if its not in the childs best interest, that this case go no futher because of the potentally damaged mindset of the child to testify. A wrist slap to the female perp.at most, she'll get lots of empathy,simpathy,and hand wring (bless her heart ) But DEATH wouldn't be good enough if it were a male perp....So whats left of our society, Biasedly-thinks.
-
We can always hope.
Not condoning ‘child porn’, but Robin Leigh Pagoria is NOT a pornographer (...torture tape). She is an abuser - a sadist, a distinct difference.
tubebility 6 months ago
FinalJusticeMovement 6 months ago
@FinalJusticeMovement
“but it seems to me you're attempting to give her a pass from having such a "strongly convicting term" such as "child pornographer" simply because of the lack of a phallus.”
Absolutely not! On the contrary, pornographer I think, is too soft a term.
As I was writing, I suspected I might have to clarify - pornographers (usually) do it for pleasure, not torture. Abuser - sadist, I think, is an apt term for this woman.
“That don't fly with us!”
Neither will it fly with me!
tubebility 6 months ago
Sorry, Tube, but semantics don't differentiate the facts, nor does it change
my position for the following reasons:
1) Not all pornography is "pleasurable", intended to be pleasurable,
or even depicted to be pleasurable to various audiences, especially
if the content is akin to that of S&M.
2) The definition of pornography doesn't change, especially where the
law is concerned in regards to CHILD pornography.
She is what she is, and if she were MALE, would you question it?
--The Final Justice
FinalJusticeMovement 6 months ago
@FinalJusticeMovement “The definition of pornography doesn't change, especially where the law is concerned in regards to CHILD pornography”
This, I would question!
The definition in law is deliberately broad (to encompass adolescent sexuality and drawn images - Sex Trade Union rules), and its application in law (and the media) is grossly misandric.
tubebility 6 months ago
TUBEBILITY:
"The definition in law is deliberately broad (to encompass adolescent sexuality
and drawn images - Sex Trade Union rules), and its application in law
(and the media) is grossly misandric.
>> Which is PRECISELY why we should remain STEADFAST and FIRM
in defining Robin Leigh Pagoria as the pornographer that she is.
She will be one of the first women to be seen and prosecuted as such
before the world! And THAT is what I call.. FINAL JUSTICE!
--FJ
FinalJusticeMovement 6 months ago