SR 22 - Debt Increase Passed

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,091
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 3, 2011

Congress increased the debt ceiling, but they shouldn't have done it.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bstill3)

  • In order to elimate the National Debt System, the "Federal" Reserve must be abolish. Where is an Andrew Jackson type U.S. President when you need one?

  • @Idtelos -- I'm here, doing my best.

  • Bankers are robbing the U.S., and its citizens are too busy watching American Idol.

  • @Idtelos -- Bread & circuses.

Top Comments

  • HEY BILL, wasn't this debt ceiling fiasco just a way to implement the so called "super congress or super council of 13" a power grab that will establish a new branch to sneak in more illegal legislation?

    Long live the republic.

see all

All Comments (109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bill is today's Woody Guthrie

  • @bstill3

    Love watching your reports Bill, a refreshing dose of truth, reality and some bloody common sense lol. Keep up the good work mate.

  • if the banks are doing this for their benefit, why dont we all just buy bank stocks?

  • Bill Still/Ron Paul 2012!

    ....

    A guy can dream..

    Bill Still Kills Banker Shills!

    Ron Paul or We Fall!

  • What's interesting here is that those projections for 5% GPD growth used by the government, and 1.5% GDP growth used as a more realistic baseline are NOMINAL GDP numbers and not adjusted for inflation. Real GPD accounting for inflation has been negative for years now, and that's why we've had to ring up these massive debts, both private and public to maintain our standards of living, which are likely falling anyway.

  • @dogbarker1981 -- A lot of people have asked me about Bitcoins. I just haven't had time to investigate and generally, I would be against the concept because it represents an extreme centralization of the money power into the hands of the whoever created them. I'm all about MAXIMUM DECENTRALIZATION of all power.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more