Truck-Delivered Dismounted Infantry Fiasco in Iraq
Uploader Comments (dynmicpara)
Top Comments
-
I am Japanese.
The war by all means though I do not understand.
We want to express
our gratitude to the serviceman in the United States of America that
fights at the front.
-
not necessarily. capturing or killing Osama Bin Laden really is irrelavent, as most people fighting us merely consider him an icon, and do not take direction from him. Larger troop numbers would help in some ways, but we're still fighting people who have the benefit of knowing the land and being able to freely cross borders of neighboring countries. Nah, I think Afghanistan would still suck (may be a tad better)
All Comments (26)
-
the reason is that people are free and equipment costs money.
bearing this in mind, if they can be this cold to their own what can they do to others and whats the likelihood of anything they say being true?
our british troops r having to buy their own kit!
we r all disposible, remember that when deciding who to side with.
-
the Gavin is like the A-10: amazing. unfortunately, they're old and ugly so the brass doesn't want anything to do with them. We get stupid wheeled vehicles and expensive jets that suck at CAS instead. muti-cam Gavins with Mk 19s instead of green or tan hummers and strykers.
-
Thats an Australian M113 at the end i believe.
-
You mean like M113 Gavins; yes, but we must use them instead of all the BS wheeled trucks our troops are dying in.
-
For giving enemies easy targets to kill and destroy?
-
PROFESSIONALS FIGHT TO STACK-THE-DECK in their favor--not make excuses that its too hard to do. We have all kinds of Army helicopters flying during the DAY TIME so apparently "special authorization" is being given so we had better repaint our choppers gray ASAP.
-
100% true..semper fi..1sgtU.S.M.C
-
We're all issued ballistic eyewear before we deploy. And taking patches off the ACUs wont protect anymore than if they are on. I understand people wanna know where all this stuff like M113s are and such, but its a whole lot of coulda-would-shoulda. Yes a M113 can be flown in by a Chinooks, but being Army aviation I can tell you Chinooks can not fly during the day unless special authorization is given. In ACUs, face paint is not going to help, we should have gotten the Multicam a long time ago
As a soldier who operated on the ground, In RAMADI, as part of a MECH unit. As soon as they figured out how much explosives to use to take out a Bradley, we then prefered to move on foot. go places you can't in a track, move into cover, easier to hide. As for personal camouflage. Have you see ACUs in the desert, not the best camo out there, so what good would face paint do. Burlap.thats just more wieght, and when it's 150 degrees out, that heat retention isnt very welcome. 11B, OIF 3 Vet
Adam160 2 years ago
You are using your own self-centered laziness as your driving force. Camo must be driven by what the ENEMY sees of us, its too bad if it makes you hot, its better than making you dead. The Bradley is a MEDIUM tank; use LIGHT Gavins and go nearly anywhere. Foot slogging is response of the American narcissist to all problems.
dynmicpara 2 years ago