McCain's Mansions

Now that Obama is in, no one is losing their house.

I hope that was sarcastic.. otherwise you have been severely misinformed.

@cajunpballer LOL

Damn, I lose stuff in my one and only house. I would HATE to have to try to remember which of my 10 houses I left my favorite pair of shoes in.

She got an interest only loan as her primary mortgage and that's not irresponsible how?

You obviously did not watch the entire video or pay heed to the words of the woman talking.

Elitists are the people which have unparalleled power in deciding the size of the sphere of freedom the non-elitists have. It also just so happens that they all have a mass of wealth behind them.
You may need to review the word 'Elitist'.
The scum part is derived from the fact that wealth can only accrued at the expense of someone else.
Money would have no value if it universally abundant, it can only retain value if it is a coveted medium, which can only be if the majority are without. THINK!

Money can be derived at the benefit of both. Your claim is absurd. If I ask you to bake a cake, I pay you your expenses and a profit, then I sell the cake at store for a bit more profit, we all made money and someone traded theirs for a cake they wanted more than the money. This is how all business works.
And money can only have value if it grows at a pace, otherwise it gets absorbed by waste and depreciation. You know virtually of economics.

No, the value of money perpetually decreases, hence inflation. The reason the value decreases is because there is a deficit it the amount of money in existence as to what is owed. Thanks to profiteering and usury.
If every person were to have an equal abundance of wealth that would incur hyperinflation.
Furthermore, your hypothesis only tackles to demographic which has wealth, those without the medium covet it, and exert for it, giving it value.
Commodities of paucity generate illusory value.

Inflation and money being derived for the benefit of both parties are not mutually exclusive. We have inflation, but we also have wealth being generated by the production of goods from labor. Money has less value, but there is more of it every minute because of production.
I was addressing your statement "wealth can only accrued at the expense of someone else." I'm not sure your last comments really argued the point I was making.