Zeitgeist Refuted (1 of 10)

Using an unproven book to try and prove its own credibility?
This movie doesn't refute anything, despite some of the propaganda in zeitgeist.

This video is beyond stupid.

Dah this is true the bible says so HA HA HA

Yeah this whoever made this is an idiot. Just because they are homos that dose not defeat the purpose for me.

For fuck sake. How can someone believe in God. Its like Moses who got his msg on mountian suprisingly no one was there..... and mohmad who wrote Quran in cave where no one was there..... and so is jesus... Also The devil is ruler of the world? are you kiding me sounds like fucking fair tale to me.

watching pt 1 of zeitgeist , Acharya s presents fact after fact after fact about the SUN being inspiration for later myths....the parallels between Jesus and older myths are too numerous and concrete to refute
ive not seen one legitimate point disputed by christians on this, and thats because they want to focus on abstract,faith based rhetoric rather than try and disprove something they know they cant

You cannot proove something dos not excist but you can proove if something does excist. in other words you should be prooving to me that christ and god are real not me prooving that they are not.

why would they state some as being a homosexual philosopher? wha the fuck does homosexuality have to do with his philosophies? or is it just thrown in there to make his ideas less appealing to the listener?

Oh my god, Zeitgeist is garbage, and easily refuted, but not by this faith-based crap.

Behold the Neo-Pharisees that recite and defend their big business religion...Behold their power resides in thou pockets