Deconstructing Dembski Homework #1 solutions
Uploader Comments (randyhelzerman)
Top Comments
-
If you want more women involved, Randy, my advice would be to wear nothing but a long boa and dance between the presentations of your concept charts. Macho Man? Put your boa where your mouth is. =0
-
Randy, you´re f***ing amazing! You are the push that makes us move!
All Comments (22)
-
How do you know that they were men? Did they all identify their gender? A lot of women have male internet identities, and many who identify as women get accused of being men anyway! P.S. Do you think that low probabilities (all men or all heads) confirm stereotypes any more than they would "design"?
-
Do you plan to continue the series?
-
I'm glad that someone finally got up and said it. There's no way to tell a "designed" thing from a random thing just by probability alone.
-
typo in second without, meant to be with, sorry
-
question 3 did not implied wither the sequences applied or not. How do you do the math without correlation without the sequences?
-
Good videos randy. I think I will submit a homework next time :) - had exams (funnily enough on the maths of artificial evolution) - I am glad your series is going well. It is a great idea.
-
Wow! I'm personally mentioned. I'm honored. :)
*logs off feeling famous*
LOL!
All the answers came from men? Hmmmm....
What are the chances of that?
:)
lovasip 3 years ago
Unbelievable, eh?
randyhelzerman 3 years ago
damn randy, you're probably the most rational polite atheists i've ever met.....EVER
migkillertwo 3 years ago
thanks migkillertwo, I really hope to keep this series friendly to people of faith.
randyhelzerman 3 years ago
keep up the AMAZING!! work :-D
foxfairandbalanced 3 years ago
thanks for the encouragment fox..
randyhelzerman 3 years ago