William R. Cline applauds the Stern Review for its ability to shift the burden of proof to those economists for whom global warming is only a farce. He proceeds to demonstrate the reasons for his agreements with the study and his points of divergence with it, which includes the study's time scale for impending environmental damage like carbon atmospheric dominance. Nicholas Stern then responds to the comments of both William Nordhaus and William Cline, attempting to clarify certain conceptual quandaries.
All Comments