Somebody needs to blow the Mexican Presidents brains out out so somebody can work on fixing Mexico as opposed to pawning off their peasants onto the US and our Welfare. Which by the way is readily available to any illegal immigrant, what a fucking joke.
Well, I see what you mean. As many, the biggest issue is that you are not part of the elite and you want a way to the top.
What else? That story of keeping out a state is even more dubious than the story that corporations are not natural to capitalism. Nothing so far can show a sign that they would not be a state like structure rebuild to serve the exact purpose as today.
CZ:2of2: That is not to say that capitalism is perfect. Far from it. In fact, the optimization of profit mandate (fiduciary duty) may actually be mutually exclusive with peace (or, at least, supportive of conflict). That's a pretty black mark against it to be sure. But it's still a better scenario than the top-down rule by an Elite offered by the collectivist branches, corporatism, socialism, and communism, each of which are also conflicted with peace, because that is the nature of top-down rule
You are focusing only on the similarities, which is only HALF the equation:
Capitalism PLUS STATE = Corporatism
Socialism has the optimize profit mandate AND the State, so is more like corporatism than capitalism is.
It is top-down rule by an "Elite" that is the problem, and that comes from corporatism, socialism, and communism.
Without a State, you have only capitalism, still with the optimization of profits mandate, but without the problems of corporatism, or top-down rule. Viva anarchism!
One key feature of capitalism is optimatization of profits. This is the point.The best way of achieving this is to maximize the income and minimize the expenditure.
Corporatism is simply the most achieved support of this capitalistic feature.
Corporatism is part of capitalism and probably its most succesful form.
CZ:2of2: ..., and its enabling-accomplice, Partisanship.
Being a merger between Big Business and Big Government/the State, corporatism is a form of top-down oligarchical collectivism - as are socialism, and communism. That is *opposite* to the core of capitalism: bottom-up, grassroots individualism, based upon individual and economic liberty. So corporatism actually has more in common with socialism and communism than capitalism, and is not a natural extension, despite its common heritage.
@jnkojnko u do know ur country support Calderon lol
miguel92996 11 months ago
how is it that mexicans can grow produce in the usa but in mexico they are starving
Konflictraps 2 years ago
Violence is the best way to a police state and many dead innocents.
Ghandi/King had the right ideas.
UnoRaza 3 years ago
Mexico, us, every country needs to feed themselves or you'll have a m0nsant0 like company triggering a shortage to pump prices worldwide.
Food Hero Percy: /watch?v=RzqLZSCsRLs
UnoRaza 3 years ago
Somebody needs to blow the Mexican Presidents brains out out so somebody can work on fixing Mexico as opposed to pawning off their peasants onto the US and our Welfare. Which by the way is readily available to any illegal immigrant, what a fucking joke.
jnkojnko 3 years ago
Well, I see what you mean. As many, the biggest issue is that you are not part of the elite and you want a way to the top.
What else? That story of keeping out a state is even more dubious than the story that corporations are not natural to capitalism. Nothing so far can show a sign that they would not be a state like structure rebuild to serve the exact purpose as today.
That is all.
TheCZMan 3 years ago
CZ:2of2: That is not to say that capitalism is perfect. Far from it. In fact, the optimization of profit mandate (fiduciary duty) may actually be mutually exclusive with peace (or, at least, supportive of conflict). That's a pretty black mark against it to be sure. But it's still a better scenario than the top-down rule by an Elite offered by the collectivist branches, corporatism, socialism, and communism, each of which are also conflicted with peace, because that is the nature of top-down rule
lastnymleft 3 years ago
You are focusing only on the similarities, which is only HALF the equation:
Capitalism PLUS STATE = Corporatism
Socialism has the optimize profit mandate AND the State, so is more like corporatism than capitalism is.
It is top-down rule by an "Elite" that is the problem, and that comes from corporatism, socialism, and communism.
Without a State, you have only capitalism, still with the optimization of profits mandate, but without the problems of corporatism, or top-down rule. Viva anarchism!
lastnymleft 3 years ago
Sorry but you did not address the point.
One key feature of capitalism is optimatization of profits. This is the point.The best way of achieving this is to maximize the income and minimize the expenditure.
Corporatism is simply the most achieved support of this capitalistic feature.
Corporatism is part of capitalism and probably its most succesful form.
TheCZMan 3 years ago
CZ:2of2: ..., and its enabling-accomplice, Partisanship.
Being a merger between Big Business and Big Government/the State, corporatism is a form of top-down oligarchical collectivism - as are socialism, and communism. That is *opposite* to the core of capitalism: bottom-up, grassroots individualism, based upon individual and economic liberty. So corporatism actually has more in common with socialism and communism than capitalism, and is not a natural extension, despite its common heritage.
lastnymleft 3 years ago