Zeena LaVey And Nikolas Schreck Interview 1 of 10

*Comments From Idiots Will Be Deleted*


Zeena LaVey (daughter of Anton LaVey) and Nikolas Schreck (founder of the Werewolf Coven)are intensely interviewed by Christian advocate Bob Larson.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Zeena
• LaVey
• interview
• Chris
• Nikolas
• Schreck
• LaVeyan
• Satanism
• Satanist
• religious
• religion
• beliefs
• ToxicThrashMeta1

[jmisic]

Bob Larson is obviously no idiot, but Zeena La Vey and Nikolas Schreck seem more enlightened

and far less prejudiced. See the Acheron interview too. They totally make Bob Larson mad. Its great.

[mrselfdestruct23]

You can not rationalise with a christian corrupter. I don't think anything theist exists, no gods, no devils, manmade mythology. We're just random evolution. Honestly though, i'd rather hang out with a Satanist anyday of the week as opposed to vile christians. Satanists, have a moral aptitude that requires more than just scripture. LaVey, I respect but his form of Satanism, I have a hard time and I've studied. Now, more or less, I'm a misanthropic pagan.

[angryamicus]

Anyone who supports the US Constitution must agree with what Zeena & Nikolas are saying. Ironically, what they say they believe in is philosophically incompatible with the idea that there is NO 1) absolute measure of reality and 2) objective Right or Wrong - both of which are required to protect Individual Rights & establish a Free Society that respects the Satanist's Right to choose their own path, as well as the Rights of Others to choose differently.

[angryamicus]

I think Zeena & Nikolas fundamentally believe in a Free (Libertarian) Society that protects individual right to choose their own morality, as long as it does not violate the rights of others. However, they leave out the most important part: Rights of Others, which is based on the idea of Inalienable or Fixed & Non-Arbitrary Rights of the Individual. A society that is without some Objective Standard of Right or Wrong can not philosophically defend the idea of Inalienable Rights of the individual.

[angryamicus]

Ironically, a Libertarian Society that upholds individual right to choose their own morality is incompatible with a "Satanic Society" based on views they present. That is because in order to protect individuals there must be an objective standard of right .or wrong, which the Constitution calls "Inalienable Rights" or "God Given Rights". It doesn't mean you have to believe in a God, only that No Person nor Govt creates reality or defines our rights - an external & objective moral arbiter.

[angryamicus]

Zeena & Nikolas claim that individuals create their own reality, but at the same time uphold the Laws of Nature as an Absolute Reality.  If Nature operates according to specific laws that are absolute & clearly defined, then how does any creature create its own reality? Essentially, what they believe is a Libertarian philosophy that the individual is free to create his or her morality & live by it. But they leave out the most important aspect and that is Inalienable Rights of the Individual.

[angryamicus]

Satanic Society would have stricter laws? But there is no right or wrong? So why is theft wrong & why should it be punished like religious Saudis? Retribution for 'wrongs' is philosophically incompatible with this idea, since Law is based on concept of Objective Morality, ie right and wrong. In a society philosophically consistent with their views there would be no Law, only individuals acting in their own interest. Likewise human sacrifice, rape etc can't be condemned under this presumption.