In the USA and UK, almost all parents buy into the idea that infants should learn to read & write as soon as possible. Indeed, many parents measure the intelligence & potential of their children by...
In the USA and UK, almost all parents buy into the idea that infants should learn to read & write as soon as possible. Indeed, many parents measure the intelligence & potential of their children by their ability to read and write at an early age. Some even try to give their babies a head start by showing them "Baby Einstein" dvds against all the advice of pediatricians and education experts.
The newspapers advise parents to check out the school league tables and do everything they can to get their children into "good schools". What is a good school? A school that's good at getting children to pass SATs. Nothing else is of interest.
The end result?
1) Good teachers (and the vast majority are good) are increasingly demoralized. They either leave the system or just resign themselves to jumping through the latest administrative hoops. Their knowledge, expertise, creativity and unique skills are sacrificed in favour of "targets", "assessment" and "conforming" to goverment frameworks.
2) Children suffer. They are increasingly stressed out by school. Their intellectual curiosity is stifled. More and more leave school unable to read or write. As children get older, they are less able to meet the more rigorous intellectual challenges of higher education - their minds are less flexible, having been constrained too early. Ask any university lecturer.
Despite the popularity of "Baby Einstein" dvds, "Literacy hours" and National curriculum assessments for children as young as seven, it's clear that early years education in the UK and USA is in crisis.
As a parent or a teacher, maybe you're thinking, "There must be a better way".
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I take UK primary teachers to Africa because they are so far behing the curve in this respect. It's sad, but we can make a huge Impact. It is such an important time in a child's development. They must be looked after properly.
Its all well & good to note that Americas system is too adversarial. But WHY is it that way?
Sweden's a relatively homogenous country. That eases the social tension. Also, for half the 20th Century Sweden implemented a program of eugenics.
Im certainly not advocating eugenics or genocide. But Swedens isolation from the 3rd world is a factor. For the same reason, Americas K-12 schools are actually pretty solid once you get away from the major urban areas.
Eugenics usually focuses on eliminating people with "special needs" and I see just as many such people in Stockholm as in say, the UK. So if there was a eugenics program, it can't have been much good!
Whilst not as heterogeneous as the USA, Sweden has had the highest rate of immigration in the EU and accepts many more asylum seekers than other EU states. Yet it succeeds in implementing, even imposing this style of education on children from Afghanistan and Iraq, etc. with good results.
IIRC, USA & Sweden both forced about 60k sterilizations in the 20th Century. Sweden's population was less than 1/20th of the USA.
Geography & politics also limited 20th century Swedish immigration. Todays immigrants might eventually make Swedens consensual society more adversarial. Cant think of a single historical example suggesting otherwise.
BTW, thanks for the civil response on such a touchy subject. I have nothing against Sweden. Theres a lot to learn from them. This video is a good counterpoint to those who would have us emulate the cram school systems of East Asia.
MondoBeno wrote: "While teaching Special Ed in New York, I used to email teachers in Sweden to find out where we were going wrong. Here's what I found: 1. The population of Sweden is smaller. Couples have fewer kids. You don't have 5 boys with the same mother and different (absent) fathers. 2. Parents are more austere when it comes to spending. 3. You pay high taxes to pay for top day care. 4. The diet is stricter with less junk. I admire Sweden. Whatever they do, it keeps everyone safe."
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Sweden's a relatively homogenous country. That eases the social tension. Also, for half the 20th Century Sweden implemented a program of eugenics.
Im certainly not advocating eugenics or genocide. But Swedens isolation from the 3rd world is a factor. For the same reason, Americas K-12 schools are actually pretty solid once you get away from the major urban areas.
Whilst not as heterogeneous as the USA, Sweden has had the highest rate of immigration in the EU and accepts many more asylum seekers than other EU states. Yet it succeeds in implementing, even imposing this style of education on children from Afghanistan and Iraq, etc. with good results.
Geography & politics also limited 20th century Swedish immigration. Todays immigrants might eventually make Swedens consensual society more adversarial. Cant think of a single historical example suggesting otherwise.
But NY & London will never be Stockholm.
om du var dig skulle förstår men, kanske skitas du
"While teaching Special Ed in New York, I used to email teachers in Sweden to find out where we were going wrong. Here's what I found:
1. The population of Sweden is smaller. Couples have fewer kids. You don't have 5 boys with the same mother and different (absent) fathers.
2. Parents are more austere when it comes to spending.
3. You pay high taxes to pay for top day care.
4. The diet is stricter with less junk. I admire Sweden. Whatever they do, it keeps everyone safe."